SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 425

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SURYA KANT, K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ.
Amanatullah Khan – Appellant
VERSUS
The Commissioner of Police, Delhi & Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 2349 of 2024 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5719 of 2023)
Decided On : 07-05-2024

IMPORTANT POINT
History Sheet’ is an internal police document and not a publicly accessible report – There is prohibition on disclosing identity of a child in conflict with law or a child in need of care and protection or a child victim or a witness of a crime through a report.

Headnote:

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 – Section 74 – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 482 read with Article 226 of Constitution of India – Opening of ‘History Sheet’ and proposal to declare as ‘Bad Character’ – Petition against – Court was apprised of some disturbing contents of History Sheet to the extent it pertained to school going minor children of appellant and his wife, against whom there was apparently no adverse material for inclusion in History Sheet – In amended Standing Order issued on 21.03.2024, in column “relations and connections”, it has been decided that identities of only those persons shall be reflected who can afford history sheeter/bad character shelter, when offender is running/wanted by police and it shall also include names of his associates in crime, abettors and receivers – Amended Standing Order emphatically says that no details of any minor relatives shall be recorded anywhere in History Sheet unless there is evidence that such minor, has or earlier had, afforded shelter to offender – There is prohibition on disclosing identity of a child in conflict with law or a child in need of care and protection or a child victim or a witness of a crime through a report etc. – ‘History Sheet’ is an internal police document and not a publicly accessible report – Extra care and precaution, to be now observed by a police officer while ensuring that identity of a minor child is not disclosed as per law too, is a necessary step to redress appellant’s grievances – It will surely prevent undesirable exposure that has been given to minor children in this case – Commissioner of Police, Delhi, directed to designate a senior police officer who shall periodically audit/review contents of History Sheets and will ensure confidentiality and a leeway to delete names of such persons/juvenile/children who are, in course of investigation, found innocent and are entitled to be expunged from category of “relations and connections” in a History Sheet. (Paras 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 13)

Facts of the case:

Appellant approached High Court of Delhi through a writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of ‘History Sheet’ opened against him and proposal to declare him as ‘Bad Character’ with entry of his name in Surveillance ‘Register-X, Part II, Bundle A’ at Police Station Jamia Nagar, District: South-East, Delhi. Single Judge of High Court has, vide impugned judgment dated 19.01.2023, dismissed appellant’s writ petition, giving rise to these proceedings.

Findings of Court:

Registry is, accordingly, directed to forward a copy of this judgement to Chief Secretary and Director General of Police of all States and Union Territories to enable them to consider and comply with observations as early as possible but not later than six months.

Result : Criminal appeal disposed of with directions.

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant approached the High Court of Delhi through a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of the ‘History Sheet’ opened against him and the proposal to declare him as ‘Bad Character’ with the entry of his name in the Surveillance ‘Register-X, Part II, Bundle A’ at Police Station Jamia Nagar, District: South-East, Delhi. The Single Judge of High Court has, vide the impugned judgment dated 19.01.2023, dismissed the appellant’s writ petition, giving rise to these proceedings.

3. Upon notice, the Delhi Police entered appearance through Mr. Sanjay Jain, learned senior counsel, who was apprised of some disturbing contents of the History Sheet to the extent it pertained to the school going minor children of the appellant and his wife, against whom there was apparently no adverse material whatsoever for inclusion in the History Sheet. It was then apprised that the format of the history sheeters was prescribed following Rule 23.8 and Rule 23.9 of the Punjab Police Rules 1934 (in short, the “1934 Rules”) as were applicable in the NCT of Delhi. Mr. Jain, learned senior counsel for the respondents, however, fairly agreed to re-visit the archaic rules with a view to ensure that the dignity, self-respect and privacy of the innocent people, who incidentally happen to be the family members of a suspect, is not compromised at any cost.

4. Mr. Sanjay Jain, learned senior counsel has today placed on record the amended Standing Order No.L&O/54/2022 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Delhi. The aforesaid Standing Order pertains to ‘Surveillance of History Sheeters and Bad Characters’. It appears that the Original Standing order was issued on 10.06.2022 and paragraph 9(2) thereof titled as “Preparation of History Sheet” was replicated from provisions of the 1934 Rules.

5. With the amended Standing Order issued on 21.03.2024, the Commissioner of Police has provided as follows:

    “The space for “relation and connection” should be filled in with a view to afford clues about those persons with whom the criminal is likely to harbour when wanted by the police, including relations or friends living at a distance from his home, and his associates in crime, abettors and receivers. It may be noted that the space for “relations and connections” in the history sheet should reflect identities of those persons who can afforded him shelter when the offender is running/wanted by the police (in general) and should include his associates in crime, abettors and receivers (in particular) and no details of any minor relatives i.e. son, daughter, siblings should be recorded anywhere in the History Sheet unless there is evidence that the minor under question can, or has earlier had, afforded shelter to the offender, “while he was on run from police”.

While preparing History Sheet, it may also be kept in mind that as per Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, there is a prohibition on disclosing the Identity of a child in conflict with law or a child in need of care and protection of a child victim or witness of a crime through a report etc. Even though the History Sheet is an internal Police document and not a publicly accessible report, care must be taken that identities of only those minor relatives are entered into the History Sheet against whom evidence exists that minor in question has earlier had, afforded shelter to the offender, while he was on run from police”. In addition to above, the particular nature of each person’s connection should be noted against each, and, when persons shown as connections themselves have history sheets, a cross reference with those History Sheets should be given. Maximum phone numbers/mobile numbers or associates/relatives/acquaintances of BCs should be collected and placed for record. Aadhar Number, EPIC number, e-mail ID, social media accounts/profiles viz, facebook, Instag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top