Back
VIKRAM NATH, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Duni Chand – Appellant
Versus
Vikram Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vikram Nath, J.
Both the above appeals assail the correctness of the judgment and order dated 29.03.2017 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh whereby the RSA No.392 of 2005 titled Vikram Singh and others Vs. Tota Ram (since deceased) through LRs was partly allowed and the judgment and decree passed by the First Appellate Court was partly upheld and partly set aside.
2. Relevant facts in brief giving rise to the present appeals are as under:
Transfer by ostensible owner – Transferees has to take reasonable care in ascertaining that transferor had power to make transfer and that they had acted in good faith – This would require specific p....
A proponent of a Will must dispel any suspicious circumstances surrounding its execution; mere assertion is insufficient to establish validity.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of proving the genuineness of a Will and the need for timely legal action in property disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
