SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI., J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, JJ.
Vanshika Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No 335 of 2024 with Writ Petition (Civil) No. 362 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 369 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 368 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 431 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 379 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 377 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 376 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 375 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 425 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 401 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 415 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 407 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 412 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 383 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 419 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 406 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 403 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 398 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 414 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 423 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 404 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 427 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 441 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 420 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 430 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 446 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 410 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 382 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 381 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 394 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 384 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 389 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 417 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 393 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 435 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) Diary No. 28729 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1741 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 449 of 2024; Writ Petition (Civil) No. 392 of 2024; Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1659 of 2024; Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1597 of 2024; Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1600 of 2024; Transfer Petition (Civil)No.1602 of 2024; Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1596 of 2024; Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1808 of 2024; Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1741 of 2024; Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1737 of 2024; Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1735 of 2024 and Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1730 of 2024
Decided on : 23-07-2024
Education – National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (UG) 2024 – Leakage of question paper – No student who is revealed to have engaged in acts of fraud or to have been beneficiary of malpractice would be entitled to claim a vested right or interest in continuation of admission in future by virtue of findings in this judgment – Directing a fresh NEET (UG) to be conducted for present year would be replete with serious consequences for over two million students who have appeared in examination – Adopting such a course of action would, in particular, (i) lead to disruption of admission schedule for commencement of medical courses, setting back entire process by several months; (ii) lead to cascading effects on course of medical education; (iii) impact the availability of qualified medical professionals in future; and (iv) cause a serious element of disadvantage to students belonging to marginalized communities and weaker sections for whom reservation has been made in allocation of seats – If any student, including in present batch, has individual grievance not bearing on issues which have been resolved by this judgment, it would be open to them to pursue their rights and remedies in accordance with law, including by moving jurisdictional High Courts under Article 226 of Constitution – However, before moving High Court for grant of relief, petitioners would have to seek withdrawal of their petitions before this Court – Union Government has constituted a Seven-Member Expert Committee – Committee will abide by such further directions as may be issued by this Court in its final judgment and order in regard to areas which should be enquired into by it so as to ensure that (i) process of conducting NEET (UG) and other examinations falling within remit of NTA is duly strengthened; and (ii) instances which came to light during course of present year are not repeated in future. (Paras 11, 12, 21, 22 and 23)
Facts of the case:
National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (UG) 2024 examination was conducted by National Testing Agency on 5 May 2024. Results were declared on 4th June 2024. In this batch of cases, petitioners assert that a direction should be issued for convening a re-test on the ground that (i) there was a leakage of question paper; and (ii) there are systemic deficiencies in modalities envisaged for conduct of examination.
Findings of Court:
Resulting transferred cases shall stand disposed of in terms of directions subject to clarification that individual grievances, if any, that remain, may be addressed before jurisdictional High Court. Interlocutory applications raising individual grievances are similarly permitted to be withdrawn with liberty reserved in the terms.
Result : Transfer petitions allowed.
ORDER
1. The National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (UG)1["NEET (UG)"] 2024 examination was conducted by the National Testing Agency2<["NTA"] on 5 May 2024. The results were declared on 4 June 2024.
2. The examination was conducted at 4,750 centres comprised within 571 cities, besides 14 cities overseas. About 23,33,297 candidates appeared for the examination. They are competing for 1.08 lac medical admissions at the undergraduate level, of which approximately 56,000 seats are in government hospitals while the balance 52,000 seats are in privately managed institutions.
3. The 50th percentile represents the cut-off for qualification. The examination consists of 180 questions, each carrying four marks, thus making a total of 720 marks overall. One negative mark is assigned for an incorrect answer. Based on the result of the NEET (UG) 2024, the 50th percentile has worked out to 164 marks out of 720. Candidates who have attained this threshold are eligible to be considered for admission but are not guaranteed admission into the MBBS program. Seats are allocated both among the unreserved category of students and the reserved category, consisting of candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Economically Weaker Sections.
4. In this batch of cases, the petitioners assert that a direction should be issued for convening a re-test on the ground that (i) there was a leakage of the question paper; and (ii) there are systemic deficiencies in the modalities envisaged for the conduct of the examination.
5. The submission which has been urged on behalf of the petitioners is that the leak which took place in the course of the NEET (UG) examination is systemic in nature and, coupled with the structural deficiencies in the conduct of the examination, the appropriate course of action in view of the previous decisions of this Court, including in Tanvi Sarwal vs Central Board of Secondary Education and Others, (2015) 6 SCC 573 and Sachin Kumar and Others vs. Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (DSSSB) and Others, (2021) 4 SCC 631 is to direct a re-test.
6. By an interim order dated 8 July 2024, this Court called for disclosures on affidavit by the NTA; the Union of India; and by the Central Bureau of Investigation3["CBI"]. While flagging the principal issues in contention, the CBI has been involved in the process because the FIRs which were registered in Delhi, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Maharashtra and Bihar have been transferred to it for investigation. In the earlier order, this Court noted that it would have to scrutinize the following aspects on the basis of the data which would emerge on the record, namely:
(ii) Whether the breach is of a nature which affects the integrity of the entire examination process; and
(iii) Whether it is possible to segregate the beneficiaries of the fraud from the untainted students.
7. Directions were consequently issued to the above agencies of the Union to make specific disclosures on the issues which have been highlighted in the previous order.
8. Arguments have been heard over four days. We have had the benefit of considering the submissions urged on behalf of the petitioners, the Union of India and the NTA. Mr Y V Krishna, Additional Director, CBI has in the course of the proceedings apprised the Court on the status of the investigation.
9. Arguments have been concluded and judgment has been reserved.
10. There is an urgent need to provide certainty and finality to a dispute which affects the careers of over two million students. Hence, it is imperative that the final conclusions of the Court be recorded at the present stage. The reasons for the ultimate conclusions will follow later.
11. We proceed to record the essential conclusions in the following terms:
Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (DSSSB) and Others
Sachin Kumar and Others vs. Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (DSSSB) and Others
National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (UG) 2024 – Leakage of question paper – No student who is revealed to have engaged in acts of fraud or to have been beneficiary of malpractice would be entitled....
(1) Cancellation of an examination, either for the purposes of gaining admission into professional and other courses or for the purpose of recruitment to a government post, is justified only in cases....
The court emphasized the right to a speedy trial under Article 21, while stating that ongoing investigations into alleged examination malpractice must conclude to ensure fair treatment of innocent ca....
The court held that postponement of scheduled examinations requires manifest arbitrariness to warrant judicial intervention, and mere hardships faced by some students do not suffice to disrupt establ....
The decision to conduct the NEET UG 2022 examination within a stipulated timeline is an administrative function and a matter of policy domain, which cannot be interfered with by the courts, unless it....
The examination authority is not liable for minor grievances raised by a negligible number of candidates, especially in force majeure situations, as these do not impact the overall integrity of a nat....
Admission to professional courses cannot be cancelled based on mere suspicion or peripheral involvement in an investigation where the student is not an accused. The right to pursue education is prote....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.