D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
Vanshika Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI
| Table of Contents |
| A. Background |
| B. Previous orders of the Court |
| C. Submissions |
| D. Issues |
| E. Analysis |
| i. Facts which have emerged during the course of the hearing |
| a. Chain of custody of question papers as detailed by NTA |
| b. Issues in Hazaribagh, Sawai Madhopur, Patna and other places |
| ii. The marks awarded for one of the questions must be revised because only one of the options is the correct answer. |
| iii. There is no conflict of interest with the Director of IIT, Madras analysing |
| the data in this case |
| iv. There is no evidence to indicate a systemic leak as on date |
| a. Position of law |
| b. The present case |
| F. The conduct of NTA: Cause for concern |
| G. Issues in the conduct of the examination and the remit of the committee constituted by the Union Government |
| H. Parting remarks |
1. This batch of matters concerns the validity of the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test1[“NEET”] for undergraduate students. The petitions were disposed of in terms of the directions issued by this Court by its judgment dated 23 July 2024. Detailed reasons were t
Kanpur University v. Samir Gupta
Anamica Mishra v. U.P. Public Service Commission
Bihar School Examination Board v. Subhas Chandra Sinha
Madhyamic Shiksha Mandal, M.P. v. Abhilash Shiksha Prasar Samiti
Sachin Kumar v. Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board
All India Railway Recruitment Board v. K. Shyam Kumar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.