SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Hima Kohli, Sandeep Mehta, JJ.
New Delhi Municipal Council and Another – Appellants
Versus
Manju Tomar And Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No(s). 7440-7441 of 2012 with Civil Appeal No(s). 7442-7444 of 2012
Decided On : 28-08-2024
Civil Appeal Nos. 7442-7444 of 2012
Education – Closing down of school – [Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 – Rules 46 and 47] – No recognised school or an existing class in school, except an unaided minority school, shall be closed without offering full justification and without prior approval of Director – School in question being run by appellant-DSGMC was receiving 95% grant from NDMC and same was closed down without due approval of Director (Education), NDMC – As a consequence, appellant-DSGMC cannot be allowed to take shield of Rule 47 of Delhi Education Rules so as to claim that burden of re-employment and payment of salaries of surplus teachers and non-teaching staff upon closure of school would be that of NDMC – Question of absorption only arises when closure of school is done in accordance with law – Since closure of school in question was undertaken de hors Rule 46, onus to absorb surplus teaching and non-teaching staff would not be that of NDMC – Civil Appeals dismissed. (Paras 18, 19 and 20)
Civil Appeal Nos. 7440-7441 of 2012
Education – Closing down of school – [Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 – Rules 46 and 47] – Direction to NDMC to bear burden of the pay and other service benefits accruing to surplus school staff including pension pursuant to illegal closure of school by DSGMC – Clear direction was given by High Court in impugned Judgment that appellant-NDMC would be entitled to seek reimbursement of entire amount from DSGMC because it illegally closed school without prior approval of appropriate authority – Since principal amount has already been paid by appellant-NDMC, there is no reason for this Court to interfere with direction given by Delhi High Court for payment of interest to staff of school, in terms of impugned judgment – Appellant-NDMC shall pay all remaining dues including interest to respondents-staff of school, within a period of eight weeks – Appellant-NDMC shall be entitled to take recourse of appropriate remedy for reimbursement of amounts paid to respondents-staff of school from DSGMC, in case DSGMC voluntarily fails to reimburse said amount. (Paras 21, 24, 25 and 26)
Facts of the case:
Only issue which requires adjudication is as to whether the appellant-DSGMC has any valid ground so as to assail impugned judgment of the High Court dated 9th December, 2009, whereby NDMC was directed to reimburse the pay and perquisites including the pension and other benefits accruing to the staff of the school and then to recover the same from appellant-DSGMC.
Findings of Court:
Leave granted to the appellant-NDMC to seek impleadment in the pending Contempt Petition before the High Court of Delhi so as to seek a direction for reimbursement of these amounts.
Result : Civil Appeal Nos. 7442-7444 of 2012 dismissed and Civil Appeal Nos. 7440-7441 of 2012 disposed of with directions.
JUDGMENT :
Mehta, J.
1. Heard.
2. These appeals filed by New Delhi Municipal Council1[Civil Appeal No(s). 7440-7441 of 2012] (hereinafter being referred to as ‘NDMC’) and Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee2[Civil Appeal No(s). 7442-7444 of 2012] (hereinafter being referred to as ‘DSGMC’) arise out of a common judgment dated 9th December, 2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 441 and 442 of 2009 and hence, they have been heard and are being decided together.
Civil Appeal Nos. 7442-7444 of 2012
3. Facts in a nutshell relevant and essential for disposal of the appeals are noted hereinbelow.
4. The appellant-DSGMC was managing and operating a school, namely, Khalsa Boys Primary School (in short ‘school’), constructed by it in the premises of the Gurudwara Bangla Sahib, New Delhi. The school was initially started with 130 students, five teachers including the Headmistress, 2 peons and one helper. The school was receiving 95% grant from the NDMC and remaining 5% contribution was made by the appellant-DSGMC towards the budget of the school. Respondents No. 1, 5, 6, 7 and 8 were employed as the Headmistress, Assistant Teacher, Water Women, Sweeper-cum-Chowkidar, Chowkidar, respectively in the school.
5. It is claimed that over a period of time, the building of the school became old and dilapidated and also, considering the growing number of devotees visiting the Gurudwara, the appellant- DSGMC was finding it difficult to run the school on a day-to-day basis. The appellant-DSGMC, therefore, decided to shift the school from its existing location to a new premises i.e. at Mata Sundari College, Old Building, New Delhi. Since the school was receiving 95% grant from the NDMC, the appellant-DSGMC moved the NDMC seeking permission to shift the school.
6. Upon receiving information about the proposed shifting of the school by the appellant-DSGMC, the Headmistress and other staff of the school challenged the said proposal by filing Writ Petitions3[WP(C) Nos. 9951-52/2005] in the High Court of Delhi. An ex-parte stay order dated 30th May, 2005 was passed by the learned Single Judge of High Court of Delhi, staying the proposed shifting of the school. However, in spite of the stay order being granted and having been communicated, the appellant-DSGMC demolished a substantial part of the school building thereby, making it non-functional. Consequent to the demolition of the school building, the NDMC stopped the grant-inaid under Rule 69 of the Delhi Education Act and Rules, 1973 (hereinafter after being referred to as ‘Delhi Education Rules’) on the reasoning that it was under an obligation to provide grant-inaid to schools which fell within its territorial jurisdiction and that the alternate location selected by the appellant-DSGMC, i.e., Mata Sundari College was outside the jurisdiction of the NDMC.
7. The High Court of Delhi disposed of the above writ petitions vide order dated 6th October, 2005 with a direction to the NDMC to consider and decide within four weeks as to whether ex-post facto sanction could be granted to the appellant-DSGMC to close down the school since the same was being shifted to an area which was outside the jurisdiction of the NDMC, thus, the shifting could lead to the closure of the school. Following the direction given by the High Court, the NDMC issued an order dated 14th February, 2006 whereby, it invoked Rule 55(1) of the Delhi Education Rules and noted that ex-post facto sanction could not be granted for running the school at the Mata Sundari College because it fell beyond its jurisdiction and consequently, it was decided to withdraw the recognition and to stop the grant-in-aid to the school being run by the appellant-DSGMC.
8. The teaching as well as non-teaching staff of the school filed fresh writ petitions4[WP(C) Nos. 13044-55/2006] in the High Court of Delhi, seeking a direction for absorption in a NDMC/Government aided school and also to command the appellant-DSGMC to pay them the salari
No recognised school or an existing class in school, except an unaided minority school, shall be closed without offering full justification and without prior approval of Director – Question of absorp....
Employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to salaries and benefits as per 6th and 7th Central Pay Commissions equivalent to those in government schools, regardless of financial hardship clai....
The Delhi School Education Act mandates private schools to align salaries of their employees with those of corresponding positions in government institutions, regardless of the school's financial sta....
The Delhi School Education Act mandates private schools comply with government salary norms for employees, irrespective of financial status, reinforcing the principle of statutory obligation over har....
Recognition and financial aid for educational institutions must align with equitable staff employment and ensure compliance with established legal conditions for staff remuneration.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.