SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Suraj Singh Gujar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
Leave granted.
2. The appellants have been convicted by the Trial Court under Sections 323, 324 and 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, six months and one year for respective offences. Vide the impugned order dated 26.12.2023, Madhya Pradesh High Court disposed of the criminal appeal of appellants by maintaining their conviction and sentence as awarded by the Trial Court.
3. Now, the appellants have filed the present appeal stating that they have settled the dispute with the injured persons vide a Compromise Deed dated 29.01.2024 and thus, pray before us to grant permission for compounding the offence.
The relevant portion from paragraphs 12 to 17 of the Settlement Deed reads as follows:
“12. That the First Party and Second Party are Uncle and Nephew in relation, thereby with the interference of elders of the family members, the First Party and Second Party have agreed to settle their dispute amicably.
13. That the First Party has tendered unconditional apology to the Second Party before the elder members of their families and the Second Party being the uncle and looking at the age of First Party has
Murali v. State (2021) 1 SCC 726 [Para 6] – Relied.
Manjit Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr. (2020) 18 SCC 777 [Para 6] – Relied.
Kailash Chand v. State of Rajasthan (2021) 18 SCC 534 [Para 6] – Relied.
Srinivasan Iyenger & Anr. v. Bimla Devi Agarwal & Ors. (2019) 4 SCC 456 [Para 6] – Relied.
Ramawatar v. State of M.P (2022) 13 SCC 635 [Para 6] – Relied.
Ramgopal & Anr. v. State of M.P (2022) 14 SCC 531 [Para 6] – Relied.
Compounding of offences – Courts cannot grant permission to compound non-compoundable offences on the basis of any sort of compromise between parties, except High Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. a....
Compromise between parties in family disputes may be accepted even for non-compoundable offences under certain circumstances to maintain harmony, despite the general prohibition under Section 320 Cr.....
The High Court can quash convictions for non-compoundable offences when the parties have amicably settled their disputes, preserving justice and social harmony.
Section 320 of Cr.P.C. does not encapsulate Section 324 and 307 IPC under its list of compoundable offences. However, fact of amicable settlement can be a relevant factor for the purpose of reduction....
Compounding of offence – While offence under Section 326 IPC is non-compoundable, exceptional circumstances of case, including voluntary settlement between parties, warrant exercise of Supreme Court’....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.