Pune Municipal Corporation vs Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(SC) 765

B. R. GAVAI, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Pune Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. K. Parmeshwar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra, Adv. Mr. Aman Varma, AOR Ms. Aditi Desai, Adv. Ms. Riya Wasade, Adv. Mr. A.N.S. Nadhkarni, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rahul Garg, Adv. Ms. Nishtha Kumar, AOR Mr. Shrom Sethi, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Mohan, Adv. Mr. S. S. Rebello, Adv. Ms. Deepti Arya, Adv. Ms. Arzu Paul, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Ninad Laud,Adv. Ivo D’Costa,Adv. Mr. Saurabh Kulkarni,Adv. Ms. Rashika Narain,Adv. Ms. Ishani Shekhar,Adv. Ms. Anshula Vijay Kumar Grover, AOR Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Adv. Ms. Vatsala Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Shukla, Adv. Mr. Shashank Singh, AOR Mr. Devanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Krishna Prakash Dubey, Adv. Mr. Akash Alex, Adv. Mr. Avijit Roy, AOR Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Ms. Swarupma Chaturvedi, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Sr.Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv. Mr. Mohdd. Akhil, Adv. Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rohan Gupta, Adv Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Krishna, Adv. Ms. Preet S. Phanse, Adv. Mr. Adarsh Dubey, Adv. Mr. K Parmeshwar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra, Adv. Mr. Aman Varma, AOR Ms. Aditi Desai, Adv. Ms. Riya Wasade, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

B.R. GAVAI, J.

1. These Civil Appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 27th October 2020 passed by the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi¹[Hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’.] in Original Application²[Hereinafter referred to as OA] No. 210 of 2020³[Earlier OA No. 34 of 2019 (WZ). Initially the OA was preferred before the Tribunal, Western Zone, and was subsequently transferred to the Principal Bench, New Delhi.] wherein the Tribunal disposed of the OA preferred by the Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch, Respondent No. 1 herein, by directing the Pune Municipal Corporation⁴[Hereinafter referred to as the ‘appellant-Corporation’.] to close the Garbage Processing Plant⁵[Hereinafter referred to as the ‘GPP’.] operated by Noble Exchange Environment Solution Pune LLP⁶[Hereinafter referred to as the ‘respondent-Concessionaire’.], at Baner, Pune and to shift the same to an alternate location in terms of the guidelines issued by the Central Pollution Control Board⁷[Hereinafter referred to as the “CPCB”.], within 4 months from the date of the order. Having directed the closure of the GPP, the Tribunal further granted liberty to the Maharashtra Pollution Control

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(SC) 765

B. R. GAVAI, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K. V. VISWANATHANPune Municipal Corporation – AppellantVersusSus Road Baner Vikas Manch – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

B. R. GAVAI, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Pune Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch – Respondent