SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1925

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI
Shariful Islam @ Sarif – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Narendra Mishra, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Nivedita Pandey, Adv. Mr. Ramjee Pandey, AOR Mr. Eashwar, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, AOR

ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State of West Bengal and carefully perused the material available on record.

2. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is reported to be in custody since 27-1-2021 and has suffered incarceration for over 1 year 6 months and there being no likelihood of completion of trial in the near future, which fact cannot be controverted by the learned counsel appearing for the State, we are inclined to grant him bail.

3. The petitioner is, therefore, directed to be released on bail, subject to such terms and conditions which the concerned Trial Court may deem fit and find appropriate to impose upon him.

4. The Special Leave Petition stands disposed of on the above terms.

5. Pending application filed in the matter also stands disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top