SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1937

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SURYA KANT, VIKRAM NATH, JJ.
Karim Adaldar – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal - Respondent
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s). 8653 of 2022
Decided On : 25-11-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Mr. Anindo Mukherjee, Ms. Aayushi
For the Respondent: Ms. Astha Sharma, Mr. Ravinder Singh, Mr. Raveesha Gupta, Mr. Mantika Haryani, Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Ms. Shreyas Awasthi, Mr. Devvrat Singh

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21(c) and 29 - Petition for Special Leave to Appeal regarding bail - The petitioner sought regular bail under the NDPS Act. The court considered the duration of custody, lack of trial progress, and granted bail without commenting on case merits. (Paras 1-2)

(B) Judicial Discretion - The court's discretion in bail proceedings depends on factors such as the period of custody and trial timelines.

Findings of Court:
The petitioner is to be released on bail, ensuring compliance with specified conditions.

Issues: The main issue was whether to grant bail based on custody and trial duration.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that prolonged detention without trial supports bail considerations.

Result: Bail granted.

Table of Content
1. bail application details and context (Para 1)
2. factors influencing bail decision (Para 2)
3. disposal of petition and bail order (Para 3)

ORDER :

1. The prayer in this case is to grant regular bail to the petitioner in First Information Report No.748 of 2021 dated 28-12-2021 under Sections 21(c) and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, registered at Hasnabad Police Station.

2. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and keeping in view the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner, and there being no likelihood of completion of trial in the near future, but without expressing any views on the merits of the case, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, 6th Court, Barasat, District – North 24 Parganas, West Bengal.

3. The Special Leave Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top