SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 914

J. K. MAHESHWARI, RAJESH BINDAL
Baidya Nath Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Sree Surendra Kumar Singh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Saket Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Harsh, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, AOR Ms. Manjula Gupta, AOR (Not present) Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Mr. (Dr.) Sumit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashwarya Sinha, AOR Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Ms. Ria Yadav, Adv. Ms. Alice Raj, Adv. Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, AOR Mr. Kanhaiya Priyadarshi, AOR Mr. Aldanish Rein, AOR (Not present) Mr. Joby P. Varghese, AOR (Not present) Mr. Chandan Kumar, AOR (Not present) Mr. Sumit Kumar, AOR (Not present) Mr. Smarhar Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, AOR (Not present) Mrs. Revathy Raghavan, AOR (Not present) For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Prasad Singh, AOR (Not present) Ms. Tulika Mukherjee, AOR (Not present) Ms. Rebecca Mishra, Adv. Mr. Azmat Hayat Amanullah, AOR (Not present) Mr. Narendra Hooda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Samir Ali Khan, AOR Mr. Pranjal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Kashif Irshad Khan, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar - I, AOR (Not present) Mr. Gopal Prasad, AOR (Not present) Mr. Atul Kumar, AOR Mr. Sudipto Singha Roy, Adv. Mr. Harsh Kumar, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Ms. Udita Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, AOR (Not present) Ms. Madhusmita Bora, AOR (Not present) Mr. Samant Singh, Adv. Ms. Pushpanjali Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Singh, AOR (Not present) Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR (Not present) Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR (Not present) Ms. Pragya Baghel, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Langar, AOR Mr. Sujeet Chaubey, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR (Not present) Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, AOR Mr. (Dr.) Sumit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Saket Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, AOR Mr. Bijay Kumar Sinha, Adv. Ms. Ananya Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Harsh, Adv. Mr. Aditya Mani Saran, Adv.

ORDER :

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2199/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

1. During the course of hearing, on being asked as to who is appearing for the Vice Chancellor and the Registrar of the Nilamber and Pitamber University, i.e., respondent nos. 4 and 5, it is informed by Mr. Samant Singh, Advocate, that Mr. Rajeev Singh, Advocate on Record, is representing them. He made a request to accommodate him because he is out of town and not available.

2. This batch of contempt petitions is part-heard from previous date and hearing is continuing since yesterday (28.08.2024). We asked the Court Master to find out as to whether Mr. Rajeev Singh is connected to Court proceedings through video conferencing or not. On checking, it reveals that Mr. Rajeev Singh is not connected online, however, his name was submitted through online portal to mark his presence in the proceedings.

3. In our view, without his presence in Court in person or appearance through VC, submission of online appearance is completely unfair, especially when he is not in Court and not even in town. On further query, it is informed that there are more counsels representing the parties, who are neither present physically before this Court nor j

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top