B. R. GAVAI, ARAVIND KUMAR, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Omkar Ramchandra Gond – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.V. Viswanathan, J.
1. Omkar Ramchandra Gond (the appellant) grew up in a middle-class family in the city of Latur in Maharashtra State. His father is a government servant. The appellant had a creditable academic performance in his tenth standard scoring 97.2%. He cleared his school final in the first division. The appellant aspired to be a doctor. Nothing wrong with it, except that he had to surmount a few legal hurdles enroute.
2. Admittedly, the appellant has speech and language disability and is diagnosed with Hypernasality with Misarticulation IN K/C/O Repaired Bilateral CLEFT of palate. The appellant is certified to have 45% (in some reports, it was mentioned as 44%) permanent disability as per the Disability Certificate dated 18.05.2017.
3. The appellant applied for the National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test NEET (UG), 2024 for admission to MBBS Course from the category of Persons with Disability (for short “PwD”) and Other Backward Classes (OBC) on 18.02.2024.
4. The application form had a disclaimer clause which stated that the eligibility under the PwD Category was purely provisional and was to be governed as per the National Medical Commission (NMC) guidelines reg
Another vs. Ambica Mills Ltd., Ahmedabad and Another
Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya and Others
Khandige Sham Bhat and Anr vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Kasaragod, and Anr
Lieutenant Colonel Nitisha & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Ravinder Kumar Dhariwal & Anr. vs. Union of India and Others
Jeeja Ghosh & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Quantified disability alone cannot disqualify candidates from educational opportunities; individual assessments must determine eligibility based on the ability to pursue the course.
Disability quantification should not disqualify candidates from medical education; functional competency must be assessed for eligibility.
The quantified disability alone cannot disqualify a candidate from medical admission; functional assessment and reasonable accommodations are essential for eligibility under the Rights of Persons wit....
The court emphasized that eligibility for medical courses must be based on functional assessments rather than mere disability quantification, reinforcing the principle of reasonable accommodation for....
Reasonable accommodation is a fundamental right for persons with disabilities, and Disability Assessment Boards must prioritize functional competence over mere quantification to ensure equality and i....
The court affirmed that the UDID must be prioritized for disability claims over conflicting assessments, reinforcing the legal right to reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities.
Exclusion from admission despite valid disability certification violates rights and mandates of reasonable accommodation under disability laws.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of meeting the eligibility criteria, including the condition of both hands being intact with intact sensation, sufficient strength, ....
The court upheld the validity of amended eligibility regulations for medical admissions requiring intact limbs and functional competency, emphasizing adherence to application timelines as lawful and ....
The court upheld the exclusion of candidates with disabilities from medical admissions based on a lawful assessment of functional eligibility, balancing inclusion with patient safety under the Rights....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.