IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. CHANDURKAR, M.M. SATHAYE, JJ
Suyash Suryakant Patil – Appellant
Versus
National Medical Commission – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner who suffers from multiple disabilities to the extent of 58% and speech disability exceeding 40% as per Certificate of Disability dated 6th August 2024 has approached this Court seeking a declaration as regards his eligibility to pursue the MBBS course. The petitioner appeared in the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test, Under Graduate-NEET UG, 2024 that was held on 23rd June 2024. A candidate suffering from a speech and hearing disability exceeding 40% is not considered eligible to pursue the MBBS course as per the Gazette Notification dated 5th February 2019 published by the Medical Council of India as amended on 13th May 2019. The petitioner on 15th August 2024 made a representation to the first respondent- the National Medical Commission (for short, ‘NMC’) stating therein that the benchmark disability of 40% and below for pursuing medicine was arbitrary and without any scientific basis. The petitioner made a request to re-consider his disqualification to enable him to pursue the MBBS course. In the absence of any response to the same, the petitioner
Disability quantification should not disqualify candidates from medical education; functional competency must be assessed for eligibility.
Quantified disability alone cannot disqualify candidates from educational opportunities; individual assessments must determine eligibility based on the ability to pursue the course.
The court upheld the validity of amended eligibility regulations for medical admissions requiring intact limbs and functional competency, emphasizing adherence to application timelines as lawful and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of meeting the eligibility criteria, including the condition of both hands being intact with intact sensation, sufficient strength, ....
Exclusion from admission despite valid disability certification violates rights and mandates of reasonable accommodation under disability laws.
The quantified disability alone cannot disqualify a candidate from medical admission; functional assessment and reasonable accommodations are essential for eligibility under the Rights of Persons wit....
The court affirmed that candidates with 40-80% disability are eligible for medical courses, promoting inclusivity in education.
The court emphasized that eligibility for medical courses must be based on functional assessments rather than mere disability quantification, reinforcing the principle of reasonable accommodation for....
The court affirmed that the UDID must be prioritized for disability claims over conflicting assessments, reinforcing the legal right to reservation for persons with benchmark disabilities.
Denial of admission to a person with disability in educational institutions, especially against the quota earmarked for persons with disability, shall be considered based on the candidate's ability t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.