Back
ABHAY S. OKA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Sirpal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ABHAY S. OKA, J.
FACTUAL ASPECT
1. The factual controversy which arises in this appeal is very limited. The respondent accused no. 2, by judgment and order dated 27th January 2016 passed by the Special Judge, CBI (PC Act), Karkardooma Courts, East District, Delhi, was convicted for the offences punishable under Section 120B read with Sections 420/419 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘the IPC’) and Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short ‘the PC Act’). He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years for each offence. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 95,00,000/. In default of the payment of the fine, he was ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 21 months. The substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The respondent preferred an appeal against conviction before the Delhi High Court. The appeal was admitted. By the impugned order dated 29th September 2016, the sentence was suspended by the learned Single Judge of Delhi High Court on the respondent furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/ with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Tri
Suspension of sentence and release on bail – Direction to pay fine issued against convicted accused is also a sentence – While convicting accused, if a direction is issued against him to pay fine, su....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to suspend both imprisonment and fine under Sec. 389 of Cr.P.C. based on the age of the case and the financial capacity o....
Conditions on bail that undermine an accused's fundamental rights must be avoided.
The Appellate Court must provide reasons when exercising discretion under statutory provisions relating to fine deposits during appeal.
Discretionary power of Appellate Court under Section 148 of NI Act must be exercised with reasons; financial inability can be considered for waiving mandatory deposit.
The court held that the discretion to suspend a sentence post-conviction must be exercised judiciously, considering the nature of the offence and the likelihood of appeal success.
Suspension of conviction in criminal cases, especially for corruption, is only permissible in exceptional circumstances where irreversible harm can be shown.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
