C. T. RAVIKUMAR, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Ramjan Khan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
1. This appeal is against the judgment of acquittal dated 31.01.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior in Criminal Appeal No. 602 of 1998 in reversal of the judgment of conviction recorded against the appellants therein viz., the respondents herein, by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Sironj in Sessions Trial No. 320 of 1996 dated 28.10.1998.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant State and learned counsel for the respondents, the convicts who were acquitted by the High Court vide the impugned judgment.
3. The case of the prosecution, in succinct, was as under: -
4. As mentioned above, the respondents herein were tried by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Sironj. The prosecution had examined 19 witnesses including Haseen Khan (PW-5) and Farid Khan (PW-9), who are the r
Jai Karan & Ors. v. State of U.P.
Govindaraju v. State by Sivaramapuram PS
State of U.P. v. Dharmaraj and Anr.
Superintendent of Police, CBI & Ors. v. Tapan Kumar Singh
Lalitha Kumari v. Government of UP & Ors.
(1) FIR – Even though it is not meant to be an encyclopedia containing chronicle of all intricate and minute details, it could be used to corroborate its maker under Section 157 of Evidence Act or to....
The appellate court emphasized that eyewitness accounts must be given due weight, and mere flaws in investigation do not automatically discount credible testimonies in murder trials.
The judgment emphasizes the principle that the guilt of the accused must be proved beyond all reasonable doubt, especially in cases based on circumstantial evidence.
An inference can never be basis of conviction when testimony of a witness is not believed on cogent reasoning.
1. If two reasonable conclusions are possible on the basis of the evidence on record, the Appellate Court should not disturb the findings of acquittal. 2. The acquittal re-enforces and reaffirms the....
(1) Dying declaration – For a statement to be termed dying declaration, circumstances discussed/disclosed therein must have some proximate relation to actual occurrence – If a dying declaration inspi....
Point of Law : Power of an Appellate Court to review evidence in appeals against acquittal is as extensive as its powers in appeals against convictions, but that power is with a note of caution that ....
The appellate court upheld the trial court's acquittal, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the necessity for compelling evidence to overturn such decisions.
(i) Acquittal – Merely because appellate Court can take another view, it cannot be a ground for reversing the judgment of acquittal.(ii) Chain of circumstances – The prosecution is required to prove....
The judgment emphasizes the need for caution in evaluating evidence in a grave crime, the requirement for independent corroboration of related witnesses, and the importance of proving the plea of ali....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.