SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1060

M. M. SUNDRESH, ARAVIND KUMAR
Aman Maheshwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Yunus Malik, Aayushmaan Vastsyayana, Vijay Kumar Maurya, Manas Tripathi, Aman Malik.
For the Respondents: Tushar Singh, S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Abhinav Parihar, Vikrant Singh Bais.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. We have perused the impugned judgment. While the co-accused have been exonerated, no such exoneration was granted in favour of the appellant. However, the High Court was pleased to dismiss the petition, inter-alia, holding that in view of exoneration of the co-accused, nothing survives for consideration, which is factually incorrect, insofar as the appellant is concerned.

3. In such view of the matter, we are inclined to set aside the impugned judgment insofar as the appellant is concerned, with a request to the High Court to consider the case afresh on merits, in accordance with law. All issues are left open to be raised before the High Court.

4. Needless to state that in view of the impugned judgment being set aside by us, the stay granted on the earlier occasion by the High Court shall continue till the disposal of the main petition by the High Court.

5. The appeal stands allowed accordingly.

6. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top