SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1484

DIPANKAR DATTA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Ajay Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. rejection of bail by high court (Para 1 , 2)
2. hearing of parties' counsel (Para 3 , 4)
3. granting bail under similar circumstances (Para 5)
4. setting aside of previous judgments (Para 6)
5. allowing appeals and disposing pending applications (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

2. The High Court by the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) has rejected the appellants' prayers for bail.

4. It has been brought to our notice that several co-accused have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 25th October, 2024 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 4410-4412/2024.

6. The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) stand(s) set aside.

8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top