SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1484

DIPANKAR DATTA, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Ajay Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. rejection of bail by high court (Para 1 , 2)
2. hearing of parties' counsel (Para 3 , 4)
3. granting bail under similar circumstances (Para 5)
4. setting aside of previous judgments (Para 6)
5. allowing appeals and disposing pending applications (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The High Court by the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) has rejected the appellants' prayers for bail.

3. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

4. It has been brought to our notice that several co-accused have been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 25th October, 2024 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 4410-4412/2024.

5. Since the appellants stand on the same footing, we are also inclined to grant bail to the appellants on the same terms and conditions as imposed by the order dated 25th October, 2024. Ordered accordingly.

6. The impugned judgment(s) and order(s) stand(s) set aside.

7. The appeals are, accordingly, allowed on the aforesaid terms.

8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top