SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, JJ.
National Highway Authority Of India – Appellant
Versus
G. Athipathi And Others – Respondents
R1: G. Athipathi, Deputy General Manager (Technical)
R2: The Chairman
R3: The Member (Adminsitration)
R4: The Chief General Manager (HR/Admn)
Civil Appeal No. 14100 of 2024 [@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.18349 of 2023]
Decided On : 09-12-2024
1[To be read as ‘National Highways Authority of India’.]
JUDGMENT :
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
Leave granted.
Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. A. Lakshminarayanan, learned counsel for the respondent no.1.
3. The present appeal arises from the Final Judgment and Order dated 01.03.2023 (hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Order”), passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras (hereinafter referred to as the “High Court”) in W.P. No.11060 of 2021, whereby the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed and the judgment dated 30.12.2020 rendered by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench (hereinafter referred to as the “CAT”) in O.A. No.310/01633/2020 was upheld.
THE FACTUAL SETTING:
4. The respondent no.1 was initially working as an Assistant Engineer in the service of the Government of Tamil Nadu. The appellant, by an order dated 27.05.2008, appointed him on deputation basis as Manager (Technical) with effect from 21.05.2008, initially for a period of three years. He worked continuously for a period of six years till 13.06.2014, when he was repatriated to the parent department viz. the Highways & Minor Ports Department, Government of Tamil Nadu. In the meantime, an advertisement dated 15.03.2014 had been issued by the appellant inviting applications for recruitment to the post of Manager (Technical) on direct recruitment basis. The respondent no.1, on 11.04.2014, had applied for the said post after receiving approval from the parent department. Subsequent to his repatriation, he appeared in the written examination on 23.08.2014 and was selected as Manager (Technical) vide order dated 11.09.2014 by the appellant. On 26.08.2015, the respondent no.1 joined as Manager (Technical). The order of appointment of respondent no.1 was passed by the appellant on 02.09.2015 with effect from 26.08.2015.
5. The post of Manager (Technical) is the feeding cadre for promotion to the post of Deputy General Manager (Technical). As per the Schedule appended to the National Highways Authority of India (Recruitment, Seniority and Promotion) Regulations, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the “Recruitment Regulations”), promotion to the post of Deputy General Manager (Technical) may be made from candidates holding the post of Manager (Technical) for a period of at least 4 years. As such, a Circular was issued by the appellant on 22.05.2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Circular”) inviting applications from all eligible Managers (Technical) for promotion to the post of Deputy General Manager (Technical). Clause 6 of the said Circular is extracted hereunder:
6. The issue of considering deputation service as regular service for promotion to the post of Deputy General Manager (Technical) was deliberated on in a Meeting of the Executive Committee of the appellant held on 12.10.2017. The decision thereon, as recorded in the Minutes of Meeting dated 20.10.2017, is reproduced hereunder:
Promotion eligibility requires continuous service without gaps; prior service on deputation does not count if repatriated before direct recruitment.
Experience gained during deputation should be considered for promotion eligibility.
: : (1) Promotion is a condition of service and consideration thereof is a fundamental right.(2) When rules specifically provide that promotion has to be made on the basis of selection where merit is....
Experience gained on deputation is valid for promotion eligibility assessment.
When comparing ACRs for promotion, upgrade gradings by one level for officer's periods on higher post versus lower post to enable fair assessment; petitioner qualifies post-upgrade.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the recognition of the petitioner's service in BSF and NIA for eligibility to the post of ASP, based on the equivalence of his rank in BSF and NIA,....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the absorption of deputationists in the CHS was as direct recruits, and their past service in their parent cadre could not be counted for the ....
The court held that past service in a different cadre cannot be counted as qualifying service for promotions in the Central Health Services, emphasizing adherence to the stipulated rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.