Union of India vs Shailja Saxena

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Shailja Saxena – Respondent

Table of Content
1. four petitions against cat orders on service counting. (Para 1 , 2)
2. amendments in chs rules regarding absorption. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. respondents' deputation and claims for past service counting. (Para 8 , 29 , 34)
4. petitioner's arguments against past service count. (Para 9 , 12 , 30 , 41)
5. judicial reasoning on eligibility for service counting. (Para 10 , 18 , 22 , 23)
6. final conclusions and dismissal of petitions. (Para 28 , 32 , 38 , 43)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. All the four petitions though impugn the separate orders of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi in separate OAs preferred by each of the respondent, all now in the General Duty sub-cadre of the Central Health Services (CHS), but each order directs the petitioner Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Union of India, to count the past service of each of the respondent as qualifying service for the purposes of promotions, post absorption in the CHS.

2. The petitions were entertained and notice thereof ordered to be issued.

3. We have heard the counsels for the petitioners and the counsels for the respondents.

4. The CENTRAL HEALTH SER

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTRAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSALUnion of India – AppellantVersusShailja Saxena – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, AMIT BANSAL
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Shailja Saxena – Respondent