SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, Amit Bansal, JJ.
Union of India - Appellant
Versus
Shailja Saxena - Respondent
W.P.(C) 4731 of 2017 and W.P.(C) 4830 of 2017 and W.P.(C) 3809 of 2018 and W.P.(C) 9348 of 2018
Decided On : 02-03-2021




The court held that past service in a different cadre cannot be counted as qualifying service for promotions in the Central Health Services, emphasizing adherence to the stipulated rules.

Headnote:(A) Central Health Service Rules, 1996 - Rule 8 - Laws governing deputation/absorption in Central Health Services - The court examined the legality of the Central Administrative Tribunal's directive related to counting past service for promotions in the GDMO sub-cadre. (Para 3)

(B) Service and Employment Law - The principle that promotions must conform to qualifying service requirements stipulated in the rules was explored, emphasizing that service in another cadre cannot be counted for promotions in CHS. (Paras 10-18)

(C) Promulgation of Rules - The amendments of 2001 and 2006 regarding absorption of deputationists were crucial in determining eligibility for promotion, as the latter contradicted the former concerning such absorption. (Para 6, 10, 26)

(D) Rights and Equities - The court rejected claims of past service for the purpose of promotion, adhering to constitutional principles and the significance of established cadential structure, preventing any adverse effect on direct recruits. (Paras 23-24, 26).

Facts of the case:
Four separate writ petitions challenged the Central Administrative Tribunal's orders allowing respondents to count past service for promotions. Respondents served in different capacities within the Central Health Services but sought inclusion of prior service for promotion eligibility.

Findings of Court:
The Central Health Service Rules clearly delineated that past service rendered outside the service could not be considered for promotion.

Issues: The court addressed whether past service could be counted towards qualifying service for promotions and the interpretation of amendments to the Central Health Service Rules regarding absorption.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that prior service rendered in another cadre cannot be counted for promotion in CHS, reaffirming that the rules strictly govern qualifying service.

Result: Writ petitions allowed; orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal set aside.

Table of Content
1. four petitions against cat orders on service counting. (Para 1 , 2)
2. amendments in chs rules regarding absorption. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. respondents' deputation and claims for past service counting. (Para 8 , 29 , 34)
4. petitioner's arguments against past service count. (Para 9 , 12 , 30 , 41)
5. judicial reasoning on eligibility for service counting. (Para 10 , 18 , 22 , 23)
6. final conclusions and dismissal of petitions. (Para 28 , 32 , 38 , 43)

JUDGMENT

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. All the four petitions though impugn the separate orders of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi in separate OAs preferred by each of the respondent, all now in the General Duty sub-cadre of the Central Health Services (CHS), but each order directs the petitioner Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Union of India, to count the past service of each of the respondent as qualifying service for the purposes of promotions, post absorption in the CHS.

2. The petitions were entertained and notice thereof ordered to be issued.

3. We have heard the counsels for the petitioners and the counsels for the respondents.

4. The CENTRAL HEALTH SERVICE RULES 1996, in Rule 3 provide for composition of service, in Rule 4, the authorised strength of service, in Rule 5, the members of the service, in Rule 6, the initial constitution of the service and in Rule 7, for the filling up of future vacancies in the service. Rule 7 refers to Schedule II and III to the Rules and which inter alia provide for method of recruitment, the field of selection for promotion including the minimum qualifying service in the immediate lower grade or grades for appointment or promotion to the posts in the respective sub-cadre and specialties within the sub-cadre concerned included in the service. In Schedule III, the method of recruitment, in the General Duty sub-cadre posts of Medical Officer is by direct recruitment on the basis of a written examination and the method of recruitment of the next higher posts of Senior Medical Officer, Chief Medical Officer and Chief Medical Officer (Non-Functional Selection Grade) is by promotion from the immediately lower cadre post, with the prescribed qualifying service. Thereafter, Rule 8 provides as under:

    "8. Filling of Duty Posts by Transfer on Deputation (including short term contract):

    (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in rule 7, where the Government is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient so to do, it may for reasons to be recorded in writing and in consultation with the Commission, fill not more than twenty duty posts in all, in the grades of Medical Officer/Senior Medical Officer in General Duty Sub-Cadre and Specialist Grade II (Junior Scale) in the Non-Teaching Specialist Sub-Cadre and Public Health Sub-Cadre by transfer on deputation of suitable officers holding analogous posts under the Central Government (including Ministries of Railways and Defence)/State Governments/Union Territories and by Short Term Contract of suitable-officers holding analogous posts under the statutory bodies, autonomous bodies, semi-government organisations, universities or recognised Research Institutions.

    (2) The period of deputation/contract shall be for a period not exceeding three years, which may, in special circumstances be extended upto five years, as the Government may think fit."

The aforesaid Rule, though provides for appointment by transfer/deputation, to the General Duty Medical sub-cadre posts, inter alia from State Governments but only for a maximum period of five years and does not provide for absorption of deputationists in the General Duty Medical sub-cadre posts of CHS, which could only be by direct recruitment.

5. However vide Central Health Service (Amendment Rules), 2001, notified on 30th July, 2001, in place of Rule 8 aforesaid, the following rule was substituted:

    "8. Filling of duty posts by deputation (including short term contract)/absorption:

    (1) Not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top