Back
BELA M. TRIVEDI, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Chandigarh Administrator & Ors. & Etc. Etc. – Appellant
Versus
Manjit Kumar Gulati & Ors. & Etc. Etc. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Both the Appeals arise out of the common impugned Order dated 14.01.2015 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in C.W.P. No.6866 of 1999 & C.W.P. No.8467 of 1999, whereby the High Court has allowed both the writ petitions. The operative part of the impugned order reads as under: -
Further, we direct the respondents to calculate and communicate the outstanding amount, requiring the petitioner to deposit the amount in question. The respondents shall also communicate the formalities, if any, required to be completed by the petitioners within one month from today. On issuance of such letter, the petitioner shall deposit the amount claimed and shall complete the formalities,
The High Court erred in allowing writ petitions challenging lease cancellation despite the allottees' failure to pay outstanding dues, as statutory authorities acted within their jurisdiction.
The binding nature of contract terms and conditions, and the voluntary acceptance of the contract by the petitioner.
Writ petitions can be maintained against administrative actions affecting contracts, especially when principles of natural justice and public policy are at stake.
The revisional authority cannot restore a booth site after resumption proceedings have become final, particularly in cases involving chronic defaulters.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
