SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1776

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, SANJAY KUMAR, JJ.
The State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Dhananjay Gupta @ Dhananjay Prasad Gupta – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 3498 of 2023 [Arising Out of SLP (Crl) No. 10810 of 2023]
Decided On : 07-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Pragya Baghel, Jayant Mohan, Adya Shree Dutta
For the Respondents: Rajan Raj, Mohini Priya

Insufficient reasons for granting bail in serious offences, especially when charges include attempted murder under Section 307 IPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353, 332, 333, 337, 393, 448, 427, 506, and 120-B - Arms Act - Grant of bail - High Court granted bail based on claims of innocence and completion of investigation - Court held that such reasons are insufficient for granting bail in serious cases - Matter remanded for fresh consideration. (Paras 2, 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The respondent, accused No. 23 in F.I.R. No. 92 dated 26.08.2022, was arrested on 28.08.2023 and granted bail on 12.01.2023 by the High Court, which was challenged by the State.

Findings of Court:
The High Court's order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration with no observations on merits.

Issues: Whether the reasons provided for granting bail were sufficient in light of the serious nature of the charges.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that mere claims of innocence or completion of investigation do not suffice for bail in serious offences, particularly when Section 307 IPC is involved.

Result: Appeal allowed; matter remanded for fresh consideration.

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal the State is directed against the order dated 12.01.2023 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in B.A. No. 12508 of 2022. The respondent-herein is accused No. 23 in F.I.R. No. 92 dated 26.08.2022 registered at Police Station Sindri, District-Dhanbad alleging commission of offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 241, 323, 307, 353, 332, 333, 337, 393, 448, 427, 506 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (I.P.C.) and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. The respondent was arrested in connection with the aforesaid crime on 28.08.2023 and his bail application was granted on 12.01.2023.

3. Heard learned standing counsel for the State of Jharkhand as also the learned counsel for the respondent.

4. The reasons that persuaded the High Court for granting bail to the respondent have been stated in paragraph-4 of the of the impugned order reads, thus:

    “4. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. Further, it has been submitted that no overt act has been alleged against this applicant. Investigation is complete. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.”

5. When the offences alleged, inter alia, includes one under Section 307, IPC and the accused concerned is so arraigned with the aid of Section 149, IPC, such submissions, reflected in paragraph or the mere factum of completion of investigation by itself, cannot be the reasons for grant of bail without due consideration of the relevant aspects. At any rate, mere claim of innocence or undertaking to participate in the trial or contention of absence of specific allegation of any overt act cannot, in such circumstances, be assigned as reasons for grant of bail in a case of serious nature. We are of the considered view that in such circumstances, impugned order deserves to be set aside and the matter is liable to be remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, the impugned order dated 12.01.2023 passed by the High Court in B.A. No. 12508 of 2022 stands set aside and the matter is remanded back to the High Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law. The application which culminated in the impugned order is restored into the file in its original number to facilitate such consideration. We make it clear that we have not made any observation touching the merits.

6. The Criminal Appeal is disposed of, as above.

7. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top