G. B. PATTANAIK, R. P. SETHI, B. P. SINGH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Raja Mahendragirji – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This appeal by the Union of India on grant of special leave is directed against the impugned judgment of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court. The question for consideration is : whether on a combined reading of the provisions contained in Section 6(1-A) and Section 7 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), it is possible to hold that the power to acquire the requisitioned property still subsists when a notice in terms of the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 7 of the Act had been issued by the appropriate authority on a date when the requisition had not lapsed by operation of law and that was stayed by the High Court on being approached by the noticee invoking the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, but the requisition itself lapsed while the writ petition was pending?
2. As it appears, the property in question was under requisition under the provisions of the Defence of India Rules since 1942 and continued to be so under the Act. On 13-2-1987, the Collector, Bombay, who was the competent authority to exercise power under Section 7(1) of the Act, issued notice under t
Union of India v. Harjeet Singh Sandhu [(2001) 5 SCC 593 : 2001 SCC (L&S) 891] [Para 5]
Union of India v. Rajbir Singh Khanna [(2001) 7 SCC 113] [Para 5]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.