SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SURYA KANT, UJJAL BHUYAN, JJ.
Anand Gram Society Hansens Disease (Leprosy) Rehabilitation Centre - Appellant
Versus
Dy. Conservator Of Forest, Pune & Ors. - Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos.7313-7314 Of 2019
Decided On : 17-12-2024
ORDER :
1. Anand Gram Society Hansens Disease (Leprosy) Rehabilitation Centre is in appeal before us challenging judgment dated 26.05.2017 and order dated 23.01.2018, passed by the National Green Tribunal, Western Zone, Pune (for short, `the Tribunal’) in Application No. 115/2015 and OA No. 120/2017.
2. It may be mentioned that the first order dated 26.05.2017 was passed by the Tribunal in Application No. 115/2015 (WZ). The said order was passed at the instance of a resident of Pune, who claimed forest land was being destroyed due to encroachments. The application apparently referred to some survey numbers of different villages where encroachments like (i) construction of road; (ii) construction by Pricast India Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.; (iii) road made on the forest land; (iv) road for goods transportation and houses; and (v) stone mines for construction of RCC used for building houses were existing.
3. Regardless of the categorical stand taken by some of the respondents that they have nothing to do with the forest land and have not encroached upon it in any manner, the Tribunal, without assigning any reason, and without any discussion on the issues jumped to a conclusion and issued a sweeping direction to the (i) Principal Chief Secretary (Forest) (ii) Principal Chief Conservator (Forest), (iii) Chief Conservator of Forest, and (iv) Collector, Pune “to take steps to remove all the said encroachments within three weeks in accordance with law and restitute the environment”. The other respondents were directed to extend full cooperation.
4. Thereafter, it seems that some proceedings akin to contempt proceedings, through O.A. No. 120/2017, were initiated and when the matter was taken up for hearing on 23.01.2018, one Dy. Conservator of Forest was present, who did not have complete instructions on facts, for which the case was passed over. Subsequently, a direction was issued to the Chief Conservator of Forest to conduct spot inspection/survey of the area along with District Collector and submit a report about the factual aspects of the structures built on the land in question. The Director General of Police was directed to provide police assistance to remove the structures etc.
5. The appellant is an NGO, which runs a Public Charitable Trust at Dudulgaon, Pune, Maharashtra and has been working for the welfare and rehabilitation of leprosy patients since 1965. The total area acquired by the appellant-Society is three acres with a 6 meter wide access road of 500 meters length. Since the appellant- Society has also been directed to remove the structures where leprosy patients are being treated for decades, the instant appeals were filed, in which we directed to maintain status quo at the site, vide order dated 13.09.2019.
6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully perused the material placed on record.
7. We are constrained to highlight that the Tribunal has failed to observe the principles of natural justice and has passed sweeping directions without determining as to whether the subject area is a forest land and if so, whether it has been duly notified under the relevant statutes. Similarly, no opportunity was granted to the bonafide users of the site like the appellant-Society to establish as to whether the Leprosy Cure Centre was being run with or without prior permission of the concerned authorities.
8. The issue as to whether the strict parameters are liable to be relaxed in a case of extraordinary circumstances has not been considered by the Tribunal. What is the purpose of the Charitable Trust, whether it is being run for the welfare of the leprosy patients and providing them timely medical treatment, and whether the Leprosy Cure Centre also deserves to be uprooted from the site treating like any commercial venture, are several factors which the Tribunal ought to have kept in mind before issuing the omnibus directions.
9. The other danger which quasi Tribunals like, the National Green Tribunal, must keep in mi
The Tribunal must observe principles of natural justice and provide fair hearing before issuing directions affecting parties' rights.
In all matters falling with the ambit of the National Green Tribunal, it is only the jurisdiction of the National Green Tribunal which can be invoked; and the petitioners should not be permitted to i....
National Green Tribunal cannot pass ex-parte orders without following principles of natural justice.
Encroachment on notified protected forest land must be removed immediately per demarcations, irrespective of prior possession claims or rejected diversion applications; forest authorities bound to re....
The NGT must adhere to principles of natural justice and cannot abdicate its adjudicatory role to committees; fair hearing is essential in decisions regarding environmental compensations.
The Court upheld that issues already settled by the NGT regarding land acquisition compliance under the 2006 Act could not be reopened in PIL, affirming the authority of prior adjudication.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.