SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 593

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.
M/S. Shanti Construction Sambalpur Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
State of Odisha and Ors. - Opposite Parties
W.P.(C) No.18697 of 2025
Decided On : 22-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S.S. Padhy, Adv.
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sonak Mishra, ASC Mr. Shanti Prapaksh Mohanty, Adv.

The NGT must adhere to principles of natural justice and cannot abdicate its adjudicatory role to committees; fair hearing is essential in decisions regarding environmental compensations.

Headnote:(A) National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Section 22 - Writ Petition challenging NGT order regarding environmental compensation - Allegations of natural justice violation and improper delegation of adjudication - NGT is an expert tribunal with specialized jurisdiction over environmental issues. (Paras 8, 10, 12)

(B) Natural Justice - The court emphasized the principle of audi alteram partem, highlighting a breach by failing to notify the petitioner about the committee’s site inspection and relying solely on its report. (Paras 13, 15, 19)

(C) Procedural Legitimacy - NGT must independently adjudicate cases rather than outsourcing its judicial role to committees, maintaining adherence to statutory and regulatory requirements. (Paras 14, 21)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a construction company, sought to quash an NGT order penalizing it for illegal excavation of minor minerals based on a Joint Committee report, arguing breaches in natural justice and jurisdictional errors.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the NGT's order was vitiated by procedural illegality and lack of fair hearing, thus it quashed the NGT's order dated 02.05.2025.

Issues: Whether the NGT violated principles of natural justice by not allowing the petitioner to contest findings and whether it improperly outsourced adjudicative functions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted the NGT’s failure to provide a fair hearing to the petitioner, constituting a breach of natural justice and preventing effective adjudication.

Result: Writ Petition allowed, NGT order quashed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to quash ngt order (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner claims violations of natural justice (Para 3)
3. ngt's jurisdiction challenged by petitioner (Para 4)
4. court reviews maintainability of writ petition (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
5. high court may entertain writ despite alternative remedy (Para 8)
6. ngt's adjudicatory role is non-delegable (Para 9)
7. environmental impact of extraction within ngt's remit (Para 10 , 11)
8. substantial questions raised over environmental matters (Para 12)
9. violation of natural justice in ngt proceedings (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
10. ngt must retain adjudicatory responsibilities (Para 16 , 17)
11. potential conflict of interest in committee composition (Para 18)
12. statutory breaches in mining activity examined (Para 19 , 20)
13. compensation must link to actual environmental harm (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
14. writ petition allowed due to procedural illegality (Para 24)
15. ngt order quashed and parties directed to pursue rights (Para 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.

1. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks a direction from this Court to quash the order dated 02.05.2025 passed by the National Green Tribunal, Eastern Zone, Kolkata in O.A. No. 167/2023/EZ, and to restrain the respondents from taking any coercive steps for recovery of environmental compensation pursuant thereto.

I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

(i) The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act and is represented through its deponent, claiming residence within the territorial jurisdiction of the Orissa High Court and asserting that the cause of action arose within such jurisdiction.

(ii) East Coast Railway, as Opposite Party No. 8, awarded the petitioner a railway track laying work along with bridge work through Letter of Acceptance dated 01.06.2022 followed by a formal contract agreement dated 25.10.2022.

(iii) An Original Application being O.A. No. 167/2023/EZ was filed before the National Green Tribunal, Eastern Zone Bench, Kolkata by certain persons describing themselves as social workers and local villagers, alleging illegal extraction of minor minerals such as earth and morrum by the petitioner from Government land in Tangi-Choudwar Tahasil, District Cuttack, for the railway work.

(iv) In the NGT proceedings, several public authorities including the State Pollution Control Board, Collector Cuttack, Revenue Department and Forest Department were arrayed as respondents on allegations of inaction despite complaints.

(v) The NGT, by order dated 23.11.2023, constituted a Joint Committee comprising senior scientist or officer of the State Pollution Control Board, District Mining Officer Cuttack, Collector Cuttack or representative not below ADM, and Divisional Forest Officer Cuttack, with the Board as the nodal body for logistics and for filing the inspection report on affidavit, and directions to recommend penalty, environmental compensation, and remedial measures if violations were found.

(vi) Pursuant to the NGT order, the Committee visited the site on 18.12.2023 and noted excavation of morrum or laterite from alleged plots and surrounding areas, and also recorded that pits were water-filled, which affected ascertainment of depth and quantification at that time.

(vii) The Committee requested the Mining Officer, being a member and competent authority, to conduct a detailed scientific survey to assess the actual quantity excavated from specified plots and surrounding areas, and a report was thereafter prepared and filed before the NGT through the Board’s affidavit.

(viii) The Joint Committee report recommended environmental compensation and also compensation as per the Odisha Minor and Minerals Compensation Rules, 2016, and the petitioner filed objections before the NGT.

(ix) The NGT disposed of the Original Application by order dated 02.05.2025 directing the State respondents and the State Pollution Control Board, Odisha to take action against the petitioner for recove

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top