Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
SURYA KANT, UJJAL BHUYAN
Neha – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Verma – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
ORDER :
1. The petitioner-wife seeks transfer of HMP No.762/2019 (RCS HM No.762 of 2019) titled as ‘Arvind Kumar Verma vs. Neha Verma’, filed by the respondent-husband under Section 3(1)(i-a) (ib) and 13 (1) (1A) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and which is pending before the Family Court, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. The petitioner-wife seeks transfer thereof to the Family Court at Nagpur, Maharashtra.
2. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 21.02.2016. There is no child born from the wedlock. It further appears that on account of matrimonial discord, the parties are living separately since 29.01.2017.
3. When the matter came up for hearing on 04.10.2024, this Court was apprised of the fact that some settlement talks were going on between the parties. They were, accordingly, advised to continue with such efforts.
4. On 24.10.2024, the parties were formally referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement. The respondent-husband was further directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-
The court can dissolve a marriage by mutual consent under Article 142 when parties have amicably settled their disputes, ensuring compliance with agreed terms.
The court upheld the dissolution of marriage by mutual consent under Article 142, confirming that the parties reached an amicable settlement through mediation and met the conditions of Section 13(B) ....
Divorce by mutual consent – A dead marriage must be given a decent quietus.
(1) Divorce – A dead marriage must be given a decent quietus.
(2) Power under Article 142(1) of Constitution of India can be exercised by Supreme Court to dissolve a marriage which has lost its vi....
In cases of marital disputes, parties may resolve issues through mediation, allowing for a settlement agreement to dissolve marriage and quash related proceedings under Article 142 of the Constitutio....
The court exercised its power under Article 142 to dissolve the marriage by mutual consent and quash all related legal proceedings.
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.