SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1275

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPANKAR DATTA, SANJAY KAROL, JJ.
PATWARI SINGH & ANR. - Appellants
Versus
STATE OF M.P. & ORS. – Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7646 Of 2012
PATWARI SINGH & ORS. - Appellants
Versus
STATE OF M.P. & ORS. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7654 Of 2012
ARVIND UPADHYAY AND ORS. - Appellants
Versus
STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7647 Of 2012
NRIPENDRA SINGH PATEL AND ORS. - Appellants
Versus
STATE OF M.P. AND ORS. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7655 Of 2012
VINOD KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. - Appellants
Versus
STATE OF M.P. & ORS. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7648-7653 Of 2012
ALL INDIA SOCIETY FOR ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M.P. & ANR. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7656 Of 2012
Decided On : 17-10-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ms. Usha Nandini V., AOR, Mr. Vikrant Singh Bais, AOR, Mr. Durga Dutt, AOR, Mr. Nilendra Pratap Singh, Adv., Mr. Shailendra Pratap Singh, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Raj, Adv., Ms. Rashi Verma, Adv., Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv., Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Adv., Ms. Rashim Bath, Adv., Ms. Anjali, Adv., Mr. Narender Kumar Sharma, Adv., Ms. Suman Sharma, Adv., Mr. Varun Punia, AOR
For the Respondents: Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR, Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, AOR, Mr. Sarthak Raizada Ga, Adv., Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, AOR, Mr. Arjun Garg, AOR, Mr. Harsh Parashar, AOR, Mr. Vikrant Singh Bais, AOR, Mr. Sunny Choudhary, AOR, Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR, Mr. Nilendra Pratap Singh, Adv., Mr. Shailendra Pratap Singh, Adv., Mr. Prasanna Mohan, Adv., Mr. Maneesh Saxena, Adv., Mr. Niteen Kumar Sinha, AOR, Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR, Mr. Vikrant Singh Bais, AOR

The court upheld the authority's discretion to set qualifications for employment, emphasizing the validity of certificates issued by recognized universities.

Headnote:(A) Circular dated 27th July 2009 - Qualifications for appointment of Patwaris - The Commissioner clarified that only certificates issued by universities recognized by UGC are valid for DCA and ‘O’ Level qualifications - The intention was to ensure that candidates possess valid qualifications as per the prescribed standards. (Paras 4, 9, 10)

(B) Employment Law - The authority to prescribe qualifications for a post lies with the employer, ensuring that only valid certificates are considered for selection - The High Court upheld the validity of the Circular and the qualifications prescribed therein. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The appellants participated in the selection process for Patwaris but their qualifications were questioned due to the validity of their DCA certificates issued by non-university institutes.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Circular did not alter qualifications mid-selection and upheld the authority's insistence on valid university-issued certificates.

Issues: Whether the Circular altered qualifications required for Patwari appointments and the validity of the DCA certificates issued by non-university institutes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the qualifications prescribed by the Circular were valid and necessary to ensure the integrity of the selection process.

Result: Civil Appeals dismissed.

ORDER :

1. Civil Appeal Nos. 7646/2012, 7647/2012, 7655/2012, 7648-7653/2012 and 7656 of 2012 are directed against the judgment and order dated 20th January, 2010, 6th October, 2009; 15th February, 2010; 6th October & 7th October, 2009, and 11th May, 2010, respectively, passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. By the judgment and order, impugned in the said appeals, dismissal of the writ petitions presented by all the appellants by the learned Single Judge, by orders of varying dates, were upheld.

2. While dismissing the writ appeals, as aforesaid, the Division Bench placed reliance on an earlier judgment and order of the Division Bench of the same High Court dated 5th October, 2009, passed in a batch of writ petitions with Writ Petition No. 8419 of 2009 being the lead petition. The said judgment and order dated 5th October, 2009 forms the subject matter of challenge in Civil Appeal No. 7654 of 2012.

3. These appeals involve a short question of law as to whether by the impugned circular dated 27th July 20091[Circular], the Commissioner, Land Records and Settlement, Madhya Pradesh altered any of the qualifications required for appointment on the post of Patwari mid-way during the process of selection. Obviously, therefore, the fate of all the appeals would depend on whether the judgment and order dated 5th October, 2009 deserves acceptance by this Court or not. If accepted, all these civil appeals would fail while non-acceptance would result in allowing the claims of the appellants.

4. An advertisement was issued on 5th June, 2008 inviting applications for appointment of Patwaris on 2194 vacant posts. Among other qualifications, clause 1.8 required the aspirants to fulfil the following qualification:

    “1.8 Educational Qualification:

    Candidate must have passed Higher Secondary or High School (10+2) Examination and must also possess ‘O’ level certification from DOEACC/IETE or 1 year Diploma in Computer Application (DCA) from an institute affiliated/registered/ recognized by a University which should have been recognized by University Grants Commission (UGC), or Higher Education in computer.”

    (emphasis supplied)

5. It is not in dispute that the appellants had participated in the selection process and acquitted themselves creditably. Their names figured in the merit list too. However, prior to verification of their testimonials/certificates (which was an exercise required to be completed in terms of the advertisement itself), the Commissioner issued the Circular. It was laid down therein inter alia as follows:

    “3. DCA Certificates which were sent by some collectors were sent to concerned University for the authenticity. It was informed by the Universities that if any institute is recognized/affiliated/registered with the University then also they don’t have the right to issue any Certificate. If any institution has issued the DCA Certificate under their seal and signatures then such certificates are not valid. Similarly DOEACC Society has also informed that only such ‘O’ Level Computer certificates are valid which have been issued by DOEACC Society Delhi. Certificates issued by institute which is affiliated to DOEACC is not valid.

    4. Therefore it directed that only those candidates who have the Certificates issued by University duly signed and stamped (sic). DCA Certificates issued under the seal and signature of any recognized/affiliated/registered institute of University should not be accepted. Similarly if any institute is affiliated to DOEACC only those Computer ‘O’ Level Certificates are valid which have been issued by DOEACC Society Delhi under its seal and signatures. Certificates issued by affiliated institutes are not valid.

    5. DCA Certificates in respect of candidates which have been examined should be re-examined in the light of above instructions.”

    (emphasis supplied)

6. It is not in dispute that the appellants’ claims of being qualified for the post of Patwari stem from awarding of Diploma in Computer Applic

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top