SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 19

C. T. RAVIKUMAR, SANJAY KAROL
Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Syeed Ather – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR For M/S. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, AOR Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Adv. Ms. Devina Sehgal, AOR Mr. S. Uday Bhanu, Adv. Mr. Vinayak Goel, Adv. Mr. Yatharth Kansal, Adv. Mr. Rajiv Kumar Choudhry, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. Ms. Adviteeya, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR Mr. G.V.R. Choudary, Adv. Mrs. Kirti Goyel, Adv. Mr. K. Shivraj Choudhuri, AOR Ms. Sindoora V.N.L., AOR Ms. Thithiksha Padmam, Adv. Mr. T.L.V. Prasad, Sr. Adv. Mr. B. Sriniwas Rao, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Mr. Mahipal Singh, Adv. Ms. Manisha Chawla, Adv. Mr. Manoj Saxena, Adv. Mr. Nitish Massey, AOR Mr. Ram Krishan, Adv. Mr. Rahul Yadav, Adv. Mr. P. Nageshwara Rao, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mayank Jain, Adv. Mr. Parmatma Singh, AOR Mr. Madhur Jain, Adv. Mr. Arpit Goel, Adv. Mr. Reshul Mittra, Adv. Ms. Aakriti Dhawan, Adv. Mr. Venkita Subramoniam T.R., AOR Mr. Rahat Bansal, Adv. Mr. Hari Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Varun Mudgal, Adv. Mr. Krishna Dev Jagarlamudi, AOR Mr. Kailash Pandey, Adv. Mr. Gaichangpou Gangmei, AOR Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Adv. Mr. Krishna Yadav, Adv. Mr. Bibhu Dutta Das, Adv. Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari, AOR

JUDGMENT :

C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

1. This bunch of cases belong to three categories, but all carry the same question(s) for resolution. The first batch of appeals viz. Civil Appeal Nos.1919-1922 of 2016 are directed against the common judgment and order dated 02.09.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in quartet Writ Petitions viz., WP Nos. 13227/2005, 13228/2005, 13229/2005 and 13230/2005. The second batch of appeals viz., Civil Appeal Nos.1923-1930 of 2016, except Civil Appeal No.1929 of 2016 which was de-tagged as per order dated 31.07.2024 are directed against the judgments and orders in different Writ Petitions carrying the same questions arising out of the identical factual situations and allowed in terms of the common judgment and order dated 02.09.2008, which is under challenge in the first batch of Civil Appeals. The third batch contains two Special Leave Petitions viz., Nos.19725-19726 of 2021, again carrying the same questions arising out of identical factual situations and allowed in terms of the common judgment and order dated 02.09.2008, which is under challenge in the first batch of Civil Appeals. In such circumstances, leave is grante

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top