VIKRAM NATH, SANJAY KAROL, SANDEEP MEHTA
Anokhilal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. These appeals stood disposed of by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 18.12.2019, whereby the impugned judgments and orders passed by the High Court and the Trial Court against the appellant are set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo consideration. While passing the judgment, certain directions, as contained in paragraph 22 of the judgment, were issued on the limited issue “whether, while granting free Legal Aid, the appellant was extended real and meaningful assistance or not” and for deciding other issues these appeals were kept pending.
2. It is stated by Mr. Sidharth Luthra, learned senior counsel, appointed as amicus curiae, that the accused- appellant was acquitted from all the charges on 19.03.2024, and against which no appeal is filed by the State. As such, the order of acquittal has attained finality.
3. As regards the other legal issues pending in these appeals, it would be open for the parties to raise the same in the pending writ petitions [Suo Motu Writ (Crl.) No.4/2019 and Writ Petition (C)No.565/2012], which are connected to these appeals.
4. In that view of the matter, there is no purpose of keeping these appeals alive on Board.
5.
The court affirmed the finality of the appellant's acquittal and emphasized the importance of adhering to previous directions regarding Legal Aid.
The court ruled that non-bailable warrants issued for acquitted persons cannot lead to their automatic release on bail by Magistrates, emphasizing the need for judicial discretion and fair trial righ....
The court set aside the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's petition, mandating a fresh consideration of the case on its merits.
The conviction was altered from murder to culpable homicide due to mitigating circumstances, highlighting the necessity of procedural fairness in legal representation.
Acquittal by the Trial Court precludes the necessity of continuing Criminal Miscellaneous proceedings.
An appellate court must provide a reasoned judgment based on thorough evaluation of evidence, ensuring that acquittals are justified beyond reasonable doubt.
A case cannot proceed when the petitioner has been acquitted by the Trial Court.
The acquittal by the Trial Court was upheld as the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the importance of the Trial Court's assessment of witness credibility.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.