Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Right to Promotion is Legitimate Expectation; Marriage-Based Transfer Can't Defeat It: Himachal Pradesh High Court
12 Mar 2026
Section 4 Official Secrets Act Presumption and Prima Facie Evidence Bar Bail in Espionage Case: Punjab & Haryana HC
14 Mar 2026
Centre Revokes Wangchuk's NSA Detention Amid SC Challenge
14 Mar 2026
No Interference Allowed in Religious Prayers on Private Premises: Allahabad HC Cites Maranatha Precedent
14 Mar 2026
No Proof of Absolute Ownership by Mizo Chiefs Bars Fundamental Rights Claim Under Article 31: Supreme Court
14 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
MADHURESH PRASAD, PRASENJIT BISWAS
Santanu Das – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and leave request. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. judicial review and tribunal functional status. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. past leave application denials. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. claims of discrimination by the petitioner. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. opposing arguments by the state. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. eligibility concerns based on leave history. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. reconsideration and outcomes of leave requests. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 8. regulations regarding study leave and eligibility. (Para 18 , 20 , 24)Click Here to Read the rest of this document |
The authority's decision to deny study leave based on previous usage and potential adverse impact on public healthcare services is valid and not discriminatory.
The court established that probationers may be granted study leave under extraordinary circumstances, despite general restrictions, and that differential treatment of similarly situated individuals i....
The court emphasized that administrative decisions must be reasoned, and the absence of a speaking order invalidates the denial of study leave under the CCS Rules.
Employees are entitled to study leave as per CCS (Leave) Rules if eligibility criteria are met, and the authority cannot arbitrarily deny this entitlement once it has been established.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article