SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. NAGARATHNA, PRASANNA B. VARAL, JJ.
Maatr Sparsh An Initiative by Avyaan Foundation – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 950 of 2022
Decided On : 19-02-2025
ORDER :
1. The petitioner herein, which is a non-Governmental organization, has filed this writ petition in public interest seeking the following reliefs:
(b) Issue a Writ, Order, or Direction in the nature of Mandamus to all Respondents to ensure that the fundamental right of nursing mother and infants are protected.
(c) Pass such other orders as may be deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of this case.”
2. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1/Union of India. Notice to respondent nos. 2 to 36 has not been issued in the matter.
Facts of the case:
3. According to the petitioner, it is an NGO formed with a view to setting up feeding rooms, child care rooms and creche at public places with the help of Government and public support. That one of its Directors, namely Advocate Neha Rastogi, realized the impediments faced by nursing mothers when she gave birth to a child. Her impediment was that she was afraid to go out in public because of the lack of facilities for feeding her child at public places and there was a sore need for breast-feeding rooms and child-care in all public places.
Petitioner’s Submissions:
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner highlighted the importance of early child-care and mother’s milk for a child, and submitted that depriving any child of mother’s milk due to lack of basic facilities at public places infringes the fundamental right of a child and the mother. Learned counsel further submitted that in today’s scenario, where women are equally participating in the growth of the nation and are stepping outside their homes in large numbers, it is imperative that child-care facilities are available in the public spaces and premises. He submitted that it was not their case that the governments have not done anything in this regard; they highlighted different provisions of law which require setting up of creche facilities. However, the submission was that no concrete steps have been taken by them to provide such basic facilities at public places, and that nursing a child in an environment which is conducive to a mother’s dignity and privacy is a fundamental right. Learned counsel prayed that specific guidelines and/or directions may be issued in respect of construction of baby feeding rooms and child-care rooms at public places throughout the country.
5. The learned counsel brought to our notice an earlier writ petition filed by the director of the petitioner NGO before the Delhi High Court titled Master Avyaan Rastogi through Guardian Neha Rastogi vs. Union of India, W.P. (C) No. 7356 of 2018. In that proceeding, the Union of India had informed the High Court that it considered feeding rooms and child-care rooms as essential services and that it had written a letter dated 27.08.2018 to all States and Union Territories requesting them to set up feeding rooms and child-care rooms for women and children. The Delhi High Court, vide order dated 06.11.2019, disposed of the petition directing the respondents therein to maintain the feeding rooms which have been made operational so far and it noted that it expects more such feeding rooms/changing rooms to be made operational.
6. During the course of submission, learned counsel for respondent no. 1/Union of India, with reference to their affidavit, drew our attention to communication dated 27.02.2024 issued by the Secretary, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India to the Chief Secretary/Administrator of all States/Union Territories, inter alia, in the context of the reliefs sought for by the petitioner herein. It was submitted that the State Governments/Union Territories would have to comply with the advisory in the form of recommendation issued by the Central Government havi
The court affirmed the fundamental rights of nursing mothers and infants, mandating the establishment of breastfeeding facilities in public spaces to ensure dignity and privacy.
(1) It is now statutory obligation of Centre and States to provide for nutritional support to pregnant women and lactating mothers, nutritional support to children and to take steps to identify and p....
Child Care Leave is justiciable and essential for the welfare of lactating mothers, emphasizing the employer's duty to act as a model employer in a Welfare State.
Point of law: As per Article 39 of the Constitution of India, the State shall direct its policy towards securing all the citizens equally, since "all have the right to adequate means of livelihood". ....
The obligation of the State to provide adequate maternal healthcare is fundamental under Art.21 of the Constitution.
The right to clean and safe public toilets for women is essential for dignity and health, recognized under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Statutory CCSL Rule 43-C prevails over institute circulars restricting CCL; promotes child care, cannot be denied arbitrarily citing staff shortages.
The court emphasized that custody decisions must prioritize the child's best interest and adhere to principles of natural justice, recognizing the mother's right to breastfeed as fundamental.
Custody decisions must prioritize the best interest of the child and adhere to natural justice principles, ensuring that moral biases do not influence legal outcomes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.