SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SANJIV KHANNA, CJI., SANJAY KUMAR, J.
Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Vincent Daniel And Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 3998 of 2024 With Civil Appeal Nos. 3999, 4004, 4005, 4012, 4002, 4013, 4006, 4001, 4000, 4014 and 4003 of 2024
Decided On : 27-03-2025
JUDGMENT
(Sanjiv Khanna, CJI.)
The issue raised in the present batch of appeals filed by the appellant, Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, relates to the applicability of the “theory of deduction” for determining the compensation payable under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 20131[Hereinafter, “Acquisition Act, 2013”].
2. Before examining the legal position, it would be appropriate to set out the facts in brief:
- By a Gazette Notification dated 12.09.2014, the Central Government declared its intention of acquiring the stretch of land falling within 3.4 km to 22.8 km of the Jabalpur-Mandla-Chilpi section, in the district of Jabalpur, State of Madhya Pradesh. The purpose of the acquisition was stated to be widening, four-laning, maintenance, management and operation of National Highway No.12-A. On 30.10.2014, the notification was also published in two newspapers.
- By a Gazette Notification dated 02.02.2015, the land was declared to have been acquired.
- On 31.08.2015, the Competent Authority and Land Acquisition Officer, Collectorate, Jabalpur passed an award determining the compensation payable for the land acquired. The award relies on the mandate of Section 105(3) of the Acquisition Act, 2013 (as amended) 2[Section 105 (3) – The provisions of this Act relating to the determination of compensation in accordance with the First Schedule, rehabilitation and resettlement in accordance with the Second Schedule and infrastructure amenities in accordance with the Third Schedule shall apply to the enactments relating to land acquisition specified in the Fourth Schedule with effect from 1st January, 2015]. It accordingly holds that for the acquisition in question, provisions relating to the determination of compensation shall apply in accordance with the First Schedule of the Acquisition Act, 2013. Further, provisions for rehabilitation and resettlement would apply as per the Second Schedule, and those relating to infrastructural amenities shall apply as per the Third Schedule of the Acquisition Act, 2013.
- The First Schedule of the Acquisition Act, 2013 states that the market value of the land has to be determined in accordance with Section 26 of the Acquisition Act, 2013. Clause (a) to Section 26(1) adopts the market value as specified under the Indian Stamp Act, 18993[Hereinafter, “Stamp Act”]. Based on the date of the Gazette Notification published as per Section 11 of the Acquisition Act, 2013, i.e., on 12.09.2014, the Competent Authority deemed it appropriate to compute the market value according to the Collector’s Guidelines for the year 2014- 20154[Hereinafter, “Collector’s Guidelines”]. These guidelines have been formulated in the exercise of the powers conferred under the Stamp Act. The Collector’s Guidelines have been annexed as ‘Annexure P-1’ to the present appeal.
- Paragraph 4.1 of the Collector’s Guidelines deals with municipal corporation areas of Jabalpur amongst other districts. It provides for the valuation of two kinds of land – converted agricultural land and non-converted agricultural land. These are further divided into Categories (A) and (B). Category (A) applies when the area of land is less than or equal to 1000 square meters, while Category (B) applies when the area of land exceeds 1000 square meters.
- The Competent Authority determined the concerned area to be non-converted land of more than 1000 square meters, which would fall under Category (B). According to the method prescribed under Category (B), the first 1000 square meters are to be valued in accordance with Category (A). This corresponds to the rate applicable to residential plots set out in Form-1 of the Collector’s Guidelines. The remaining area is to be valued at the rate for agricultural land as specified in Form-3 of the Collector’s Guidelines. In the present case, the Competent Authority applied the rate for Village Katiyaghat, which is specified as Rs.1,50,00,000 pe
Smt. Tribeni Devi and Others v. Collector of Ranchi and Vice Versa
Haryana State Agricultural Market Board v. Krishan Kumar
Dy. Director, Land Acquisition v. Malla Atchinaidu and Others
Mummidi Apparao (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. v. Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited and Another
Lal Chand v. Union of India, (2009) 15 SCC 769 [Paras 8
Bijender and Others v. State of Haryana and Another
Jawajee Nagnatham v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Adilabad, A.P. and Others
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti. Sahaswan, District Badaun v. Bipin Kumar and Another
R. Sai Bharathi v. J. Jayalalitha and Others
AI
The theory of deduction does not apply under the Acquisition Act, 2013; compensation must be based on the highest market value as per the Stamp Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the theory of deduction cannot be applied in cases governed by statutory guidelines, and the impugned order passed by the Court below did not ....
The determination of compensation under the Land Acquisition Act should be based on the circle rates notified by the Collector, and the amount of compensation cannot be lesser than the amount notifie....
The Supreme Court held that circle rates should not be the sole criterion for determining compensation under the Land Acquisition Act; the authority must use objective criteria.
The compensation for land acquisition must reflect the prevailing market value based on sale deeds within three years prior to notification, not an arbitrary figure, ensuring just compensation under ....
Compensation for acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act cannot be determined solely on the basis of rates mentioned in the records/ documents issued by the Deputy Registrar, Registration and St....
Land Acquisition - Ex-parte proceedings - it is not possible to fix compensation with exactitude or arithmetic accuracy. Depending on the facts and circumstances of the case, the court may have to ta....
Acquisition of land - Quantum of compensation - Court is guided by relevant and admissible evidence and practical or pragmatic ways of commercial transactions, suitable adjustment towards deduction f....
The court held that a government circular excluding one year of sale instances from land valuation violates statutory provisions, requiring adherence to all sale instances in the three years before a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principles of 'Reduction and Deduction' and valuation of agricultural land in determining just and fair compensation for acq....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.