SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 619

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SANJAY KAROL, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, JJ.
Hyeoksoo Son Authorized Representative For Daechang Seat Automotive Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Moon June Seok & Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 1856 of 2025 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 6917 of 2024)
Decided On : 08-04-2025

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Achal Shekhar, Adv. Ms. Aayushi Pandey, Adv. Ms. Parul Shukla, AOR Ms. Shubhangi Pandey, Adv. Mr. Saday Mondol, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Rajiv Shakdher, Sr. Adv. Mr. Poornachandrian R., Adv. Ms. Sivani K.m.s., Adv. Mr. Lakshmikamth G., Adv. Mr. Sunil Kumar S., Adv. Mr. Pai Amit, AOR Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Raghavendra M. Kulkarni, Adv. Ms. Mythili S, Adv. Mr. M. Bangaraswamy, Adv. Mr. Venkata Raghu Mannepalli, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar, Adv. Ms. Vaishnavi, Adv.

The High Court's quashing of criminal proceedings was premature as prima facie evidence existed, necessitating a trial to determine the veracity of allegations.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 406, 408, 409, 418, 420, 120B read with 34 - Quashing of criminal proceedings - High Court quashed chargesheet citing lack of prima facie evidence against the accused - The complainant alleged fraud involving significant sums of money and misappropriation of funds by financial advisors - The appeal challenges the High Court's decision to quash the proceedings, arguing that the inherent powers should not be exercised to examine the reliability of allegations - The court emphasized the need for a prima facie case to be established and the importance of protecting investments while ensuring due process. (Paras 2, 10, 14)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Inherent powers of the High Court - The court reiterated that the High Court should not conduct a mini-trial or assess the veracity of allegations at this stage. (Paras 8.1, 10)

Facts of the case:
The complainant, a company, alleged that its financial advisors misappropriated substantial funds under the guise of tax payments, leading to a significant financial loss. The High Court quashed the proceedings against one accused, citing insufficient evidence.

Findings of Court:
The court found that prima facie evidence existed to suggest a connection between the accused and the alleged fraud, warranting the revival of proceedings.

Issues: The main issue was whether the High Court was justified in quashing the proceedings based on the lack of prima facie evidence against the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the High Court's quashing of proceedings was premature, emphasizing the necessity of a prima facie case and the importance of due process in criminal proceedings.

Result: Appeal allowed, and proceedings revived.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KAROL, J.

Leave granted.

2. This appeal is at the instance of the complainant-Company aggrieved by the final judgment and order dated 19th February, 2024 in Criminal Petition No.5599 of 2023 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, whereby under its inherent powers, the Court quashed the criminal proceedings as well as the chargesheet in C.C.No.8373 of 2023 which, in turn, was registered as a result of Crime No.287 of 2022 at Sanjay Nagar Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 406, 408, 409, 418, 420, 120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, pending on the file of III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.

Factual Background & Proceedings leading up to this Appeal

3. The instant case pertains to the alleged fraud having been committed by the respondent while in the employment of Daechang Seat Automotive Ltd.1[Hereinafter “the Company”] The present appellant is the authorized representative of the said Company. The main business of this company is to manufacture seat related equipment for cars of the ‘KIA’ make. The services of Mr. Nikhil K.S. of M/s. N.K. Associates were engaged as Chartered Accountants and Financial Advisors. Over time, a close relationship developed. The substance of the dispute is that the Company was informed that it had wrongly claimed input tax credit amounting to Rs.9,73,96,225.80p., by N.K. Associates. It was further said that the said amount owed to the Goods and Services Tax Department and failure to pay the same entails serious consequences. N.K. Associates then informed the Company that it is the standard practice in India for tax amounts payable to be transferred to the financial advisors who would then pay it onward to the concerned department. In furtherance of the same, the Company, after some internal transfer of money from one account to another, made a transfer from its Indian Overseas Bank Account, which was used for payments, statutory or otherwise, totaling to Rs.10,18,54,894.80p. The complaint, which is appended as Annexure P-3 to the paperbook, provides the following breakup of payments :

S.No.

Date

NEFT UTR

Beneficiary

Beneficiary a/c

Amount

1

01-04-2022

NEFT-UTIB. IOBAN22091590159

TERMINUS

917020081077149

5760505

2

01-04-2022

NEFT-KARBIOBAN22091590236

N.K. ASSOCIATES

120200010009370

1900988

3

01-04-2022

NEFT-UTIBIOBAN22091490315

TERMINUS

917020081077149

2150988

4

03-04-2022

NEFT-UTIBIOBAN22093412543

TERMINUS

917020081077149

4481412

5

03-04-2022

NEFT-KARBIOBAN22093412570

N.K. ASSOCIATES

120200010009370

1000000

6

03-04-2022

NEFT-KARBIOBAN22093412628

N.K. ASSOCIATES

120200010009370

4185800

Extracted hereinbelow is the portion of the said complaint, which describes the discovery of the alleged deceit perpetrated by N.K. Associates :

“13. In the month of October, 2022, the management of the shareholders of the Company in Korea was enquiring into the state of finances of the Company including statutory payments. It was noticed that huge payments such as the aforesaid had been made, and the reason for such payments was sought from the Indian employees. After enquiry and discovery, the Company and its shareholder discovered the following shocking facts :

(a) The GST portal itself has all the information related to GST payments by the Company;

(b) Rs.7,26,25,840/- was due for GST as suggested by the report Issued by NK & Associates dated 5th March 2022;

(c) On 03.04.2022, GST payment of Rs.7,26,25,840/- was made by adjusting the input tax credit already available with the Company;

(d) There wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top