SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 758

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, JJ.
R. Ranjith Singh & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. of 2025 [Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 5137-38 of 2021] With Civil Appeal No. of 2025 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 20061 of 2022]
Decided On : 01-05-2025

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. Mr. C. Paramasivam, Sr. Adv. Mr. M.p. Parthiban, AOR Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mrs. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Bilal Mansoor, Adv. Mr. Shreyas Kaushal, Adv. Mr. S. Geyolin Selvam, Adv. Mr. Alagiri K, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR Ms. Devyani Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Adv. Ms. Tanvi Anand, Adv. Mr. Danish Saifi, Adv. Mr. Pranjal Mishra, Adv. Mr. M. Karpaga Vinayagam, Sr. Adv. Mr. M Karpaga Vinayagam, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sreegesh M.k, Adv. Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR Mrs. V.santhanalakshmi, Adv. Mrs. Meera Karta, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Pal, Adv. Mr. Puneet Thakur, Adv. Mr. Yashodeep P Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. M. Karpaga Vinayagam, Sr. Adv. Mr. M Karpaga Vinayagam, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sreegesh M.k, Adv. Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR Mrs. V.santhanalakshmi, Adv. Mrs. Meera Karta, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Pal, Adv. Mr. Puneet Thakur, Adv. Mr. Yashodeep P Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Ravi Shankar Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Adv. Ms. Sameeksha Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Sahil Goyal, Adv. Mr. Binay Kumar Das, AOR Mr. A. Selvin Raja, AOR Mr. Musthafa Atheeq .a, Adv. Mr. Ashokkumar .k, Adv.

Amendments favoring in-service candidates in seniority over direct recruits violated constitutional equality, necessitating merit-based revisions.

Headnote:(A) Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1955 - Article 309 of the Constitution of India - Seniority concern in police sub-inspector recruitment - State Government granted 20% reservation under direct recruitment for in-service candidates with retrospective effect, leading to disputes concerning inter-se seniority between departmental candidates and open market recruits - Court found such amendments violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21, as they favored less meritorious candidates over those with higher scores. (Paras 22, 24, 28)

Facts of the case:
The core issue involved the fixation of seniority between directly recruited Sub-Inspectors of Police from an open market (80%) and from in-service candidates under a 20% quota established by government orders, with many in-service candidates scoring lower marks yet gaining preferred seniority. (Paras 7-19)

Findings of Court:
The Court ruled the amendments aiding in-service candidates unwanted executive directions conflicting with statutory rules, warranting a recasting of seniority based solely on merit. (Paras 22, 29)

Issues: The key issues encompassed whether retrospective seniority for in-service candidates undermines meritocratic principles and violates constitutional guarantees. (Paras 9, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The Court established that amendatory power cannot grant preferential treatment contrary to established merit; prior recruitments under 80% direct recruitment entailing clear merit measures must direct seniority. (Para 29)

Result: The GO dated 21.11.2017 was quashed; necessary amendments to be made for revising seniority lists, reinforcing the merit-based selection process. Appeals disposed of without costs.

Table of Content
1. fixed seniority rules under tamil nadu regulations. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. controversy over seniority preferences in police recruitment. (Para 6 , 7 , 19)
3. court's rationale for evaluating seniority discrepancies. (Para 8 , 15 , 18)
4. arguments about merit vs. seniority in recruitment. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. executive instructions cannot override statutory rules. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
6. mandate for seniority based on merit in recruitment. (Para 23 , 24 , 26 , 27)
7. instructions for revising seniority lists and recruitment process. (Para 28 , 29)

JUDGMENT :

(Satish Chandra Sharma, J.)

1. Leave Granted.

2. The present appeals are arising out of common judgment dated 08.01.2020 passed in Writ Petition No. 25263/2009 and Writ Petition No. 33544/2018 by High Court of Judicature at Madras, which relates to disputes concerning seniority in the cadre of Sub-Inspector of Police in the State of Tamil Nadu.

3. The undisputed facts of the case reveal that the appellants before this Court were appointed as Sub-Inspectors of Police through a process of selection, keeping in view Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “1955 Rules”). The 1955 Rules have been framed in exercise of powers conferred under the Tamil Nadu District Police Act, 1859, Chennai City Police Act, 1888 and Article 309 of the Constitution of India. The recruitment rules provide for various modes of recruitment which includes; (a) recruitment by transfer; (b) direct recruitment; and (c) recruitment by promotion. In the present case, the statutory provisions necessary to decide the controversy involved (relating to direct recruitment and promotion) are reproduced hereunder:

    “Rule 3 – Method of Appointment and promotion

    (a) (i) Appointment to the several classes and categories shall be made as indicated in Annexure – I.

    (ii) Persons who were already included in the ‘C’ list for a particular year but not promoted before the expiry of the validity of the said list be considered for higher place in the list drawn in the subsequent year on merits of each case in preference to other persons included in the ‘C’ list.

    (b) (i) Promotion to the under mentioned posts shall be made on grounds of merit and ability seniority being considered only where merit and ability are approximately equal.

    Inspectors – Inspector of Police (Fingerprint)

    Senior Reporter, Shorthand Bureau, Vellore Sub-Inspectors-Sub Inspector of Police (Fingerprint)

    Assistant Sub-Inspectors (Omitted as per G.O. No. 721 (Home dated 26-4-1 w.ef. 3-5-1990)

    Reserve Inspectors

    Reserve Sub-Inspectors

    Reserve Assistant Sub-Inspector (Deleted in G.O.Ms. No. 1827)

    Head-Constables including Band Head Constables, Office of the Director General of Police, Madras.

    Reserve Head Constables including Armourers, Signallers and Motor Transport Drivers.

    (ii) Such promotion shall be made from a list of qualified candidates suitable for promotion prepared and finalised by

    (a) The State Promotion Board constituted by the Director General of Police, subject to the appointment of the Government from time to time in the case of promotion to the post of inspectors, reserve Inspectors and Senior Reporters, Shorthand Bureau, Madras from the ranks of Sub-Inspectors, Reserve Sub-Inspectors and Junior Reporters, respectively.

    (b) The Range Promotion Board in respect of various units as detailed below, subject to the approval of the Deputy Inspector General of Police or Commissioner of Police, Madras, as the case may be in respect of promotion from the posts of Head constables to Reserve Sub-Inspectors and from the post of Had Constables to Sub-Inspectors (There shall be only one combined list for promotion from the rank of Head Constables to Sub- Inspectors.

    The Range Promotion Board of the Range specified in Column (1) of the Table below shall consist of the District and Unit specified in the corresponding entries in Column (2) therefor.

    xxxx xxxxx xxx xxx

Annexure – 1

[Referred to in rule 3(a)]

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top