SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 891

ABHAY S. OKA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Dileep Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Sanjay R Hegde, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anand Singh, Adv. Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, Adv. Ms. Abhilasha Shrawat, Adv. Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Anindit Mandal, Adv. Mr. Darsh Bansal, Adv. Ms. Shreya Mansi James, Adv. Mrs. Aarthi Rajan, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Mrs. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Adv. Ms. Sairica S Raju, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Adv. Mr. Shreeyash U Lalit, Adv. Ms. Ameya Vikrama Thanvi,Adv. Ms. Shreya Jain,Adv. Ms. Manisha Chava,Adv. Ms. Neelam Sharma , AOR Mr. Anant Vijay Palli, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anupam Raina, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Palli, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR Ms. Alka Goyal, Adv. Mrs. Urvashi Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Archana Preeti Gupta, Adv. 1 Mr. Sanjay R Hegde, Sr Adv. Mr. Anand Singh, Adv. Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, Adv. Ms. Abhilasha Shrawat, Adv. Mr. Kartik Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Anindit Mandal, Adv. Mr. Darsh Bansal, Adv. Ms. Shreya Mansi James, Adv. Mrs. Aarthi Rajan, AOR

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!)

What is the status of Air Force School, Bamrauli, under Article 12 in relation to writ jurisdiction under Article 226?

What is the test for determining whether a body is a "State" or "authority" under Article 12, and does pervasive control by the government/IAF render the School an "authority" for Article 226 purposes?

What are the implications for public law remedies when an educational institution is privately managed but discharges a public function, in relation to mandamus under Article 226?


Table of Content
1. definition of 'state' under article 12. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual basis of the disputes regarding employment in the air force school. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. arguments on the control and funding structure of air force schools. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. relevant case law regarding public duty and educational institutions. (Para 11 , 12)
5. court's observations on the applicability of writ jurisdiction. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
6. final observations and the honoring of public function by air force schools. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
7. judgment and directive for the appeals. (Para 31)

JUDGMENT :

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

FACTUAL ASPECTS

1. The issue involved in these two appeals is whether the Air Force School, Bamrauli, in District Allahabad, is a ‘state or authority’ within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India.

2. Air Force Schools were established in the year 1966 for imparting education to the children of the personnel of the Indian Air Force (IAF). Indian Air Force Educational and Cultural Society (for short, ‘the Society’) was registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. It was registered on 10th November 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top