HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
Mrs. Nimisha Gupta W/o Shri Hans Kumar Gupta - Petitioner
Versus
Army Public School, Jaipur Military Station Jaipur Through Principal - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5158, 5060, 5067, 5149, 5150, 5153, 5154, 5155, 5163, 5164, 5173, 5176, 5182, 5183, 5194, 5209, 5210, 5243 of 2021
Decided On : 15-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petitions filed by teachers challenging termination. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. preliminary objection on maintainability raised by respondents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioners argue for the public character of education provided. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. constitutional provisions for state definition under article 12. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. consideration of authority's status as 'state' under article 12. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. previous judgments determining the maintainability of writs. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. termination of petitioners based on possession of qualifications. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 8. dismissal of writ petitions as not maintainable. (Para 35 , 36) |
Order :
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
1. All these writ petitions were filed on the ground that petitioners are qualified for appointment as teacher in any of public school and pursuant to advt. issued by the Army Public School, the petitioners were appointed on the post of Teacher, but during term of employment, the respondents have relieved and terminated the services of the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners do not possess the qualification mandatorily required for appointment as PRT teacher in Army Public School. The petitioners have challenged the removal and termination by filing separate writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
2. These writ petitions are preferred by petitioners with common question of law, hence they are decided by a common order.
3. Prayer in each of the writ petition is reproduced as under:
“S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5158/2021:
i) by appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the impugned order dated 30.3.2021 issued by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside;
ii) by appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to allow continue to the petitioner to work as PRT in Army Public School by waiving the condition of 6 months bridge course with all consequential benefits.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5060/2021:
i) by appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the impugned order dated 30.3.2021 issued by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside;
i) by appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to allow continue to the petitioner to work as PRT in Army Public School by waiving the condition of 6 months bridge course with all consequential benefits.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5067/2021:
1. by appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the impugned order dated 30.3.2021 issued by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside;
2. by appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to allow continue to the petitioner to work as PRT in Army Public School by waiving the condition of 6 months. bridge course in Elementary Education with all consequential benefits.
3. Any other Court order which this Hon'ble in the facts and deemed just and proper circumstances of the case may be passed in favour of the petitioner.
4. by an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof the condition of probation in appointment order dated 24.4.2018 may kindly be quashed and set-aside and the petitioner be declared confirmed w.e.f. 24.4.2018 i.e. the date of her appointment on regular basis, alternatively probation extension order dated 18.3.2020 issued by the respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside and the petitioner be declared to be confirmed on the post of PRT with effect from 24.4.2019 on completion of 1 year as per applicable Rule 132 (b) of the Rules and Regulations;
5. by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to file Circular dated 3.12.2018 and on perusal of the same, the Circular 3.12.2018 be quashed and set-aside qua the petitioner, or alternatively, Circular 3.12.2018 be declared to be prospective and the same be declared to be inapplicable to the petitioner being ap
Army Welfare Education Society (AWES), New Delhi versus Sunil Kumar Sharma
St. Mary’s Education Society and Anr. versus Rajendra Prasad Bhargava and Ors.
Binni Limited versus Sadasivan
Marwari Balika Vidyalaya versus Asha Srivastava
Ajay Hasia and others versus Khalid Mujib Sehravardi and others
Pradeep Kumar Biswas versus Indian Institute of Chemical Biology and others
Army Public Schools, managed by a registered society, do not qualify as 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution, rendering writ petitions under Article 226 not maintainable.
The judgment established that a writ petition for enforcement of a contract of service is not maintainable if the services are not controlled or regulated under any statute.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the absence of a public law element in the termination of employment renders a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India no....
Writ petition against a non-governmental institution is not maintainable as it does not amount to 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution of India due to lack of state control or funding.
The Army Welfare Education Society is not a 'State' under Article 12, and the doctrine of legitimate expectation does not apply to private employment disputes.
The Army Welfare Education Society is not a 'State' under Article 12, and employment disputes governed by private contracts are not subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226.
Air Force Schools, being under the control of the IAF, are deemed 'State' under Article 12, allowing for writ jurisdiction under Article 226.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.