SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 933

B. V. NAGARATHNA, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Baljinder Singh Alias Aman – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Dev Datt Kamat, Sr. Adv., Mr. Revanta Solanki, Adv. Mr. Hruday Bajentri, Adv., Mr. Lalit Singla, Adv., Mr. VPS Mithewal, Adv., Mr. Shivam Garg, Adv., Ms. Varsha Sharma, Adv., Mr. Lalit Singla, Adv., Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Adv., Ms. Lara Siddiqui, Adv., Ms. Pratibha Singh, Adv., Mr. Dhruv Kaushik, Adv., Mr. Sarfaraj Ahmed Siddiqui, Adv., Mr. Vikram Patralekh, Adv.
For the Respondents: Mr. Siddhant Sharma, AOR, Ms. Osheen Bhat, Adv., Mr. Aman Dwivedi, Adv., Mr. Karan Sharma, AOR, Mr. Pushpinder Singh, AOR, Ms. Anurag Rana, Adv., Mr. Dharmendar Singh, Adv., Mr. Harsh Wadhwani, Adv., Mr. Randeep Singh Rai, Sr. Adv., Mr. D. Bharat Kumar, Adv., Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv., Mr. Aman Shukla, Adv., Mr. M. Chandrakanth Reddy, Adv., Ms. Mehak Sharma, Adv., Mr. Gopal Jha, AOR, Mr. Yash Gupta, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Leave granted.

2. These appeals have been preferred by the complainant by being aggrieved by the order dated 14.11.2024 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CRM-M- 35115/2024 (O&M) and CRM-M-36312/2024 (O&M).

3. By the impugned order, the High Court has set aside the order of the Trial Court declining to grant regular bail to the respondents herein and consequently, has allowed the petitions for bail. At this stage itself, it may be mentioned that the regular bail was sought by the respondents herein with regard to the FIR No.30 dated 22.03.2023 which was registered under Sections 302, 323, 148, 149 (Sections 148 and 149 deleted and Sections 34, 427, 120B added later on) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “IPC”) at Police Station Nangal, District Rupnagar.

4. The said FIR was registered based on the statement given by the complainant (hereinafter “appellant”) against accused No. 1 – Mandeep Singh alias Bhoda and accused No.2- Narinder Kumar alias Nindi (hereinafter “respondents”).

5. According to the statement of the appellant, he runs his own crusher under the name 'Sat Sahib' located in the village Haripur. He purchased land measuring appr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top