SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1975

INDIRA BANERJEE, A. S. BOPANNA
Vivek Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. writ under article 32 for enforcement of rights. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. no fundamental right claimed; law-making is legislative domain. (Para 8 , 22)
3. mandamus can compel public duty; legislative commands not enforceable. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. petition barred by res judicata; vague allegations unsupported. (Para 18 , 23 , 24 , 25)
5. writ petition dismissed; applications disposed of. (Para 26 , 27)

ORDER :

The application for permission to argue and appear in-person being IA No. 117315/2021 is allowed.

2. Heard the Petitioner appearing in-person.

3. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction on the Respondent No.1, i.e. the Union of India, to impose restrictions to prevent Civil Servants from contesting elections to the Legislature, Central or State, on a political party ticket, immediately after retirement or resignation from service, by imposing a “Cooling off Period”.

4. Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, appropriate proceedings may be filed in this Court, as of right, for enforcement of any of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top