Back
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Meena (Dead) Represented through LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Prayagraj – Respondent
Key Points: - The Supreme Court allowed an appeal to enhance compensation awarded in a motor accident case (!) . - The injured claimant died during the pendency of the appeal, and their legal heirs were substituted as appellants (!) (!) . - The original claimant suffered a 100% disability following a motor accident on 04.06.2005 (!) . - The Tribunal initially awarded a total compensation of Rs. 8,56,970/- (!) . - The High Court marginally enhanced the compensation (!) . - The Supreme Court found scope for further enhancement considering the deceased survived for almost 19 years in a vegetative state and medical bills were produced for subsequent treatment (!) . - The Court awarded an additional Rs. 1 lakh for future treatment (!) . - The total compensation awarded by the Supreme Court was Rs. 12,53,770/- (!) . - The remaining compensation amount is to be paid to the legal heirs within two months, equally (!) . - Legal heirs are to provide separate account details to the insurance company for online deposit of the amount with interest (!) .
JUDGMENT :
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The injured was the claimant before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, who died during the pendency of this appeal on 25.01.2024. The husband and the two daughters, who are the legal heirs of the original claimant, have been substituted as the appellants.
3. An accident occurred on 04.06.2005, when the injured was travelling in a bus. There was 100% disability assessed by the doctor, who was examined before the Tribunal. Both the Tribunal and the High Court has accepted the percentage of disability. The original appellant (deceased), at the time of the accident was 50 years old and accepting her monthly income as Rs. 3,000/- a multiplier of 13 was applied and the total loss of income was assessed as Rs. 4,60,000/- by the Tribunal. The Tribunal also awarded Rs. 50,000/- for pain and suffering and Rs. 1,20,000/- for attendant charges; computing the monthly expense at the rate of Rs. 2,000/- for five years. The actual bills produced for the medical expenses comes to Rs. 1,68,970/- and an additional amount of Rs. 50,000/- for nutritional and transportation was granted, thus totaling Rs. 8,56,970/-.
4. The High Court marginally enhanced
Injury in motor accident – There is no reason to prohibit legal representatives to pursue claims for loss of property, akin to estate of injured, if injured dies subsequently.
Legal representatives can pursue claims for personal injury compensation after the claimant's death, as established by the amended Section 167(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Legal heirs of an injured claimant can pursue compensation for loss of estate, including loss of income, even after the claimant's death during the claim process.
Legal representatives can claim only for pecuniary losses after the death of the injured in motor vehicle accidents.
(1) In case of death, legal representatives of deceased can pursue claim – Property, under the Act, will have a much wider connotation than conventional definition.(2) In assessing, what has been des....
Legal representatives can claim damages for pecuniary loss after a claimant's death, but not for personal injuries suffered themselves.
The court upheld the need for proper evidence linking injuries to death in compensation claims, emphasizing the importance of accurate classification in motor accident cases.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of claimants to enhanced compensation under various heads including loss of estate, funeral expenses, pain and suffering, loss of c....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
