Back
MANOJ MISRA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Daivshala – Appellant
Versus
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employment-related accident details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. high court's reversal of compensation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments on employment nexus. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. questions regarding accident's connection to employment. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. clarification of section 51e impact. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. impact of statutory interpretations on claim adjudication. (Para 16 , 22) |
| 7. nature and intent of the esi and ec acts. (Para 18 , 21 , 24 , 25 , 27) |
| 8. interpreting laws in congruence context. (Para 46 , 49) |
| 9. final ruling restoring original compensation. (Para 56 , 57) |
JUDGMENT :
K.V. VISWANATHAN, J.
1. Shahu Sampatrao Jadhavar was employed as a watchman in the Respondent no. 2-Sugar Factory. His duty hours were from early morning 3 am to 11 am. On 22nd April 2003, he left home on his Motorcycle to report for duty. However, unfortunately, he never reached his place of work. When he was 5 kms away from the factory, his motorcycle was involved in a fatal accident. He left a large family behind. A widow, four children and his mother.
2. In a claim filed under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter the ‘EC Act’) the employer and the insurance company set up the defence tha
Phrase ‘accident arising out of and in course of his employment’ occurring in Section 3 of EC Act will include accident occurring to an employee while commuting from his residence to place of employm....
The court affirmed that injuries sustained in the course of employment, even outside regular hours, qualify for dependents' benefits under the E.S.I. Act.
The court held that claims under the Motor Vehicles Act are maintainable even if the deceased was covered under the Employees' State Insurance Act, provided the injury is not an 'employment injury'.
The burden of proving an accident during the course of employment lies with the claimant, and the journey from the workplace to home for a lunch break is not considered in the course of employment.
The court affirmed that an employee's accidental death during commute can be deemed to arise out of employment under the doctrine of notional extension, impacting liability and compensation assessmen....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
