Back
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, MANOJ MISRA
Managing Director Bihar State Food And Civil Supply Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of facts regarding procurement and alleged fraud. (Para 2) |
| 2. background of the rice procurement agreement and disputes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. criminal proceedings against rice millers for fraud. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 19) |
| 4. court observations on the extent of court's scrutiny under the arbitration act. (Para 16 , 18 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. key arguments presented by the parties. (Para 20) |
| 6. legal principles on arbitrability concerning serious fraud. (Para 21) |
| 7. legal principles governing arbitrability in fraud cases. (Para 25) |
| 8. dismissal of appeals and final decision on arbitration. (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.
| Contents | |
| I. | Introduction. |
| II. | Facts. |
| III. | Issue. |
| IV. | Submissions. |
| V. | Principles governing arbitrability in cases involving allegations of serious fraud. |
| VI. | Scope |
1. Leave granted.
I. Introduction.
2. These appeals arise out of the final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna allowing applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 1[Hereinafter referred to as the ‘Arbitration Act.’]
Disputes involving serious fraud allegations do not preclude arbitration; issues of non-arbitrability and limitations should be resolved by the arbitral tribunal, not courts.
The court affirmed that objections regarding non-arbitrability of disputes are not to be considered at the pre-referral stage under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court established that serious allegations of criminality do not automatically render partnership disputes non-arbitrable unless they permeate the entire arbitration agreement.
The court held that allegations of fraud and misappropriation of funds, when inter se and with no public implications, are arbitrable under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that serious allegations of fraud and the pending criminal case against a party may make it improper to refer disputes to arbitration, leading to t....
Allegations of financial misconduct must establish criminal intent; mere breach of contract does not constitute a criminal offence under IPC sections 406 and 420.
The existence of an arbitration clause mandates dispute resolution through arbitration, and mere allegations of fraud do not preclude this process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
