Back
DIPANKAR DATTA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Mathews J. Nedumpara – Appellant
Versus
Supreme Court Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed by advocates for fir registration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contention against k. veeraswami judgment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. previous petitions dismissed on similar issues. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. failure to produce evidence of representation. (Para 8) |
| 5. lack of evidence for representation to police. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. writ petition dismissed due to abuse of process. (Para 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
DIPANKAR DATTA, J.
1. This writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of 4 (four) petitioners. The first three are advocates while the fourth is a chartered accountant.
2. The petitioners have prayed for a writ, order or direction to the respondents/Delhi Police to register a First Information Report1[FIR] and cause an effective and meaningful investigation into the incident of fire and recovery of burnt currency notes from the residence of a Judge of the Delhi High Court; in the alternative, to direct the Police/Union Government to seek permission of the Chief Justice of India for registration of an FIR. Couple of other reliefs have also been claimed in the writ petition on similar lines.
3. The primary contention urged by the first petit
Court affirmed that petitioners must approach authorities with representations before filing for judicial intervention, impacting police authority to act on FIR requests.
:NON REGISTRATION OF FIR - Complainant must avail of his alternate remedy to approach the Magistrate concerned under Section 156(3) CrPC and if he does so, the Magistrate will ensure, if prima facie ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the High Court cannot issue a direction for registration of an FIR under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the aggrieved person sh....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory registration of FIR under Section 154 of Cr.P.C., the availability of remedies under Section 156(3), and the limitations of invoking ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
