SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 168

GURPAL SINGH AHLUWALIA
Poojabai urf Mango Bai Ahirwar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Narendra Nikhare for petitioner; Swapnil Ganguly, Deputy Advocate General for respondents.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking following relief(s):-

^^¼v½ ;g fd] ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk izLrqr ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkdj] ;kfpdkdrkZ ds }kjk dh xbZ f'kdk;r dh fu"i{k tkap dh tkdj vfHk;qDrx.k ds f[kykQ vijk/k iathc) fd, tkus gsrq vukosndx.k dks funZsf'kr djus dh d`ik dh tk;sA

¼c½ ;g fd] vU; vuqrks"k tks ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ;kfpdk dh izd`fr ds vuqlkj tks mfpr le>s og Hkh ;kfpdkdrkZ dks fnyk;s tksu dh d`ik dh tkosA^^

2. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that in spite of complaint made by petitioner pointing out the commission of cognizable offence no FIR has been registered.

3. The moot question for consideration is as to whether this Court in exercise of power under Article 226 of Constitution of India can direct the Police Authority to register the FIR or not?

4. The Supreme Court in the case of Aleque Padamsee and others v. Union of India & Ors, reported in (2007) 6 SCC 171 has held as under :-

“7. Whenever any information is received by the police about the alleged commission of offence which is a cognizable one there is a duty to register the FIR. There can be no dispute on that score. The only question is whether a wri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top