SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1197

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
Kamal Gupta – Appellant
Versus
L. R. Builders Pvt. Ltd – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. C. Aryama Sundaram, Sr. Adv.(Arguing Counsel) Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Sethi, Adv. Mr. Dhiraj Abraham Philip, AOR Mr. Chandratanay Chaube, Adv. Mr. Rahul Pawar, Adv. Mr. V Giri, Sr. Adv.(Arguing Counsel) Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Himanshu Satija, Adv. Mr. Karan Khanna, Adv. Mr. Harshit Khanduja, Adv. Ms. Sujal Gupta, Adv. Mr. Harshed Sundar, Adv. Ms. Neha Mehta Satija, AOR Ms. Simran Mulchandani, Adv. Mr. Vishal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pulkit Khanduja, Adv. Mr. Shailendra Slaria, Adv. Mr. Rushabh Kapadia, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv.(Arguing Counsel) Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv.(Arguing Counsel) Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Sr. Adv.(Arguing Counsel) Mr. J Sai Deepak, Sr. Adv.(Arguing Counsel) Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Adv. Ms. Kanika Singhal, AOR Mr. Shekhar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shivek Trehan, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Adv. Mr. Moksh Tyagi, Adv. Ms. Muskan Puri, Adv. Mr. Kartik Kumar, Adv. Ms. Ishika, Adv. Mr. Ishan Kumar, Adv. Ms. Ayushi Sinha, Adv.

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT :

ATUL S. CHANDURKAR, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Two questions arise for consideration in these appeals namely,

(a) Whether it is permissible for a non-signatory to an agreement leading to arbitration proceedings to remain present in such arbitration proceedings?

(b) After appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, whether it is permissible for the Court in such disposed of proceedings to issue any further ancillary directions concerning the arbitration proceedings that have commenced pursuant to appointment of the arbitrator?

3. Facts relevant for considering the aforesaid questions are that on 20.06.2015, an oral family settlement was entered into between members of the Gupta family, namely Pawan Gupta and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top