SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1373

SANDEEP MEHTA, VIKRAM NATH
Harjinder Singh @ Kala – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of the case and initial trial details. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. appellant's defense and claims. (Para 9 , 10)
3. analysis of circumstantial evidence principles. (Para 12 , 13)
4. evidentiary standards for extra-judicial confessions. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. suspicions regarding the extra-judicial confession's credibility. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. motive and its significance in circumstantial evidence. (Para 22 , 23)
7. analysis of motive as proved or conjectured. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
8. recovery of murder weapon and its evidentiary shortcomings. (Para 30 , 31)
9. disclosure statement's deficiencies and overall evidence evaluation. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
10. final ruling against the conviction. (Para 37)
11. acquittal and conclusion of the appeal. (Para 38 , 39)

ORDER :

2. Leave granted.

4. The appellant filed an appeal[CRA-D No. 1557-DB of 2015 (O&M).] against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence passed by the trial Court before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.[Hereinafter referred to as 'High Court'.] The Division Bench of the High Court, vide judgment dated 19th March, 2019, rejected the crimina

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top