1. Appeal for bail — Offence with maximum seven-year imprisonment — Period of incarceration served. (Para 3 )
Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(SC) 1480
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ABHAY S. OKA AND AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, JJ.
Devesh Yadav - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.42 of 2025 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Criminal) No.17866 of 2024)
Decided on : 03-01-2025
The Court granted bail to the appellant pending trial, considering the period of incarceration (3 years and 8 months) relative to the maximum sentence (7 years) for the alleged offence as a ground for enlargement on bail.
Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 437 - Bail - Maximum sentence for the offence is 7 years - Appellant has undergone 3 years and 8 months of incarceration - In light of the facts, the appellant is entitled to be enlarged on bail - The Trial Court is directed to enlarge the appellant on bail pending trial on appropriate terms and conditions. (Paras 3, 4, 6)
Facts of the case:
The appellant, Devesh Yadav, had been incarcerated for a period of 3 years and 8 months related to an alleged offence with a maximum sentence of 7 years.
Findings of Court:
The court finds that, considering the time already served, the appellant deserves bail.
Issues: The main issue was whether the appellant should be granted bail given the length of time already served and the nature of the offence.
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the length of incarceration warranted bail under the circumstances, reinforcing the principle that those who have served significant time are often entitled to bail, especially in non-violent cases.
Result: Appeal allowed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Consideration of maximum sentence for the alleged offence and period of incarceration already undergone for determining bail eligibility. (Para 3 )
3. Grant of bail based on the proportion of incarceration already undergone relative to the maximum sentence prescribed for the alleged offence. (Para 3 )
4. Appeal allowed — Appellant to be enlarged on bail pending trial on appropriate terms and conditions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 )
5. What factors are relevant when considering bail for an appellant who has already served a significant portion of the maximum sentence?
The court considers the maximum sentence prescribed for the alleged offence and the actual duration of incarceration already undergone by the appellant to determine if they deserve to be enlarged on bail. (Para 3 )
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned senior Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent-State.
3. The maximum sentence for the offence alleged against the appellant is of 7 years imprisonment. The appellant has already undergone incarceration for a period of 3 years and 8 months. In the facts of the case, the appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
4. For that purpose, the appellant shall be produced before the Trial Court within a maximum period of one week from today. The Trial Court shall enlarge the appellant on bail, pending trial, on appropriate terms and conditions including the condition of regularly and punctually attending the Trial Court and cooperating with the Trial Court for early disposal of the case.
5. The other directions issued under the impugned order are not disturbed.
6. The appeal is accordingly allowed.
