SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1495

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Neha Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Anand Bharti – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks transfer of divorce case. (Para 1)
2. husband not present despite notice. (Para 2)
3. counsel heard and evidence reviewed. (Para 3)
4. transfer of case warranted. (Para 4)
5. order to transfer and dispose applications. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

ORDER :

1. By way of this petition filed under Section 25 CPC, the petitioner - wife seeks transfer of Divorce Petition filed by the husband being case No. HMA 1572 of 2024, titled "Anand Bharti vs. Neha Sharma" pending before the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court - 01, South West, Dwarka Courts, Delhi to the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court at Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh.

2. The respondent-husband, although served with the notice issued by this Court yet has chosen not to remain present before this Court either in-person or through an advocate.

3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and gone through the materials on record.

4. Sufficient cause having been made out by the petitioner -wife, warranting transfer of the case, as prayed for by her, the Transfer Petition deserves to be allowed. It is ordered accordingly.

5. Consequently, Case No. HMA 1572 of 2024, titled "Anand Bharti v. Neha Sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top