SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1530

MANMOHAN, DIPANKAR DATTA
Gurmeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Table of Content
1. rejection of bail application (Para 2 , 3)
2. prosecution witnesses declared hostile (Para 4 , 5)
3. length of custody and bail consideration (Para 6 , 7)
4. order to grant bail and its conditions (Para 8 , 9)
5. final conclusion and order (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)

ORDER :

1. Leave granted.

2. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh by the impugned judgment and order dated August 30, 2024 has rejected the appellant's prayer for bail.

3. The appellant, figuring as an accused in FIR No. 44 dated March 8, 2023 registered with Police Station Beas, District-Amritsar, is in custody since 08.03.2023. It is alleged in the FIR that the appellant committed offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 307, 392, 342, 34, 325, 394, IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the ARMS ACT .

4. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the materials on record.

5. We find from the counter affidavit that the first three key witnesses for the prosecution PW-1 (Amit Kumar), PW-2 (Surinder Kumar) and PW-3 (Sonu Bagga) have been declared hostile.

6. The appellant has been behind bars for more than two years and only 5 (five) out of 17 (seventeen) prosecution witnesses have been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top