KRISHAN PAHAL
Maheshwari – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. List has been revised. This is the second bail application. First bail application was rejected by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.7.2021.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri V.K. Gupta, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 122 of 2019, U/S 498A, 307, 304B IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Puranpur, District Pilibhit, during the pendency of trial.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has not put forward any new ground for bail except the ground that two prosecution witnesses have been examined in Court and they have not supported the prosecution story. They have completely resiled from their earlier statement given to the I.O. and the allegations of the FIR. The witnesses have been cross-examined by the public prosecutor after declaring them hostile. There is no possibility of conviction in the present case under the circumstances. Learned counsel has stated that the applicant has no criminal history and in case, the applicant is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail.
5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehementl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.