SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1543

SANDEEP MEHTA, SANJAY KAROL, VIKRAM NATH
Rajeev Kishor Gautam – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Table of Content
1. facts of the case regarding the assault (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding bail and roles in incident (Para 8 , 9)
3. court's analysis of the high court's bail decision (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. conclusion granting appeal and setting aside bail (Para 13 , 14)

ORDER :

2. The present appeal arises out of the order dated 24.04.2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 24649 of 2024, whereby the High Court granted anticipatory bail to three accused persons in connection with offences under Sections 34 1 , 323, 307, 379, 302, and 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860[In short, "IPC"]. The appellant before us is the original complainant.

4. According to the statement of the appellant, one of the accused first struck a blow on the head of the deceased with an iron rod, causing him to fall unconscious. Thereafter, the other accused persons assaulted him with lathis and also attacked those who attempted to intervene. The appellant and his uncle suffered serious injuries, while the appellant's father later died in hospital.

6. However, the High Court, by the impugned order, granted anticipatory bail to three of the accused persons.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top