SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, K.V. VISWANATHAN, JJ.
Rama Kant Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar & Ors. – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No.829 of 2026 (@Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.837 of 2026)
Decided On : 11-02-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Section 482 – Anticipatory bail – Grant of – Case registered for offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 – Anticipatory bail may be granted by Court even in a case of murder provided Court is convinced that accused persons praying for anticipatory bail have been falsely implicated due to some personal vendetta, political rivalry etc. – Accused praying for anticipatory bail has to make out more than a prima facie case of false implication – Grant of anticipatory bail is not a matter of course – Prima facie, ocular version as narrated is in tune with medical evidence on record – Just because title suit is pending between parties by itself could not have been a ground to believe that accused persons have been falsely implicated – Respondents have criminal antecedents – Impugned Order passed by High Court set aside – Appeal allowed. (Paras 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18)
Facts of the case:
Present appeal arises from the Order passed by High Court of Judicature at Patna dated 30-7-2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.30622/2025 by which anticipatory bail application preferred by Respondent Nos.2 and 3 – herein respectively came to be allowed in connection with case registered for offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita respectively.
Findings of Court:
Principles governing grant of anticipatory bail differ to a considerable extent from principles governing grant of regular bail. This shall be kept in mind by concerned Court while considering the regular bail application of the accused persons.
Result : Appeal allowed.
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal arises from the Order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna dated 30-7-2025 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.30622/2025 by which the anticipatory bail application preferred by the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 – herein respectively came to be allowed in connection with Bishanpur Police Station Case No.14 of 2025 registered on 27-1-2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (for short the, “BNS, 2023”) respectively.
3. Later in point of time as the injured succumbed to the injuries, Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023 (erstwhile Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, the “IPC”) came to be added.
4. The appellant before us is the son of the deceased. He also happens to be the original informant. The First Information Report lodged by the appellant – herein with the concerned Police Station on 27-1-2025 reads thus:-
The Hon’ble Officer-in-Charge
P.S. Bishanpur, Darbhanga
Sir,
With due respect this is to inform that, I Ramakant Singh alias Sonu S/o Shri Shubh Narayan Singh am the resident of the village - Gorhiyari, P.S. Bishanpur, District Darbhanga. On 23.01.2025 at about 9.00 AM when I was going to recharge my mobile, then on the way (1) Rajneesh Kumar Singh alias Aman Kumar Singh aged 24 years S/o Ratneshwar Singh surrounded me infront of his house near the bridge and while using abusive and unparliamentary languages at me tried to kill me while throwing from the bridge and snatched my mobile and assaulted me by punch. Somehow I managed to escape and narrated the entire incident to my father and other family members on which my father and cousin brother Jai Shankar Prasad Singh and others went to the house of Ram Singhasan Singh for coercing. While hearing this Ram Singhasan Singh became very angry and ordered to kill them, upon which Rajneesh Kumar Singh @ Aman Kumar Singh assaulted on the head of my father with the butt of pistol and Ratneshwar Singh with the iron rod and Ram Singhasan Singh also assaulted on the head of my father. My father fell down on the ground. When Jaishankar Prasad Singh tried to save him, then Seema Devi and Aarti Devi started throwing the bricks and stones. Even in the his fallen conditions, the all the accused persons assaulted on the head of my father with the rods and hammer and a lot of blood started oozing out from the mouth and nose of my father. During this period, while seeing the peoples coming they fled away. In his senseless condition. I brought my father alongwith my family members to DMCH, Darbhanga at 10.00 pm for treatment but seeing his critical condition they referred him to Patna for better treatment. When I reached Muzaffarpur, then his condition had worsened, hence he was taken to Prasad Clinic Muzaffarpur but the Doctors there also seeing his critical condition suggested to take him to Patna. On 24.01.2025 at 4'O clock day he was admitted in ‘Samay Hosptia’ Patna, where his brain surgery has been conducted. He is struggling with life and death on ventilator in ICU. Administration has been informed about the incident. My snatched mobile is Realme-C35, Seam No.7488807358. Due to the previous enmity, they tried to kill.
Therefore, it is humbly requested from the Hon’ble Sir that appropriate legal action be taken against the guilty persons. For this I would be grateful to the Hon’ble Sir.”
5. It appears that in all six persons have been named as accused in the FIR inclusive of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 respectively before us. The Respondent Nos.2 and 3 apprehending arrest prayed for anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court. The Sessions Court declined to grant them anticipatory bail.
6. In such circumstances, they went before the High Court.
7. The High Court accepted their plea and granted them anticipatory bail.
8. The High Court while granting anticipatory bail observed in para 6 as under:-
Accused praying for anticipatory bail has to make out more than a prima facie case of false implication – Grant of anticipatory bail is not a matter of course.
Grant of anticipatory bail – Although grant of bail is a discretionary exercise, Courts must be cautious to exercise this discretion judiciously – Balance has to be struck to protect individual liber....
Anticipatory bail – Specious reason of change in circumstances cannot be invoked for successive anticipatory bail applications, once it is rejected by a speaking order and that too by same Judge.
Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in heinous offences.
Repeated anticipatory bail applications without a change in circumstances can be considered an abuse of the court process.
Anticipatory bail applications can be granted under changed circumstances, providing protection against wrongful arrest while ensuring cooperation with the investigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.