SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1563

VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA
Rahamathulla – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Table of Content
1. need for clubbing multiple firs for the same speech. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 10)
2. details of firs relating to hate speech. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 16)
3. challenge to registration of multiple firs. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
4. justification for multiple firs based on jurisdiction. (Para 14 , 15 , 17)
5. decision to transfer and club trials. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)

ORDER :

2. The petitioners have filed the instant writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction for clubbing of the multiple FIRs/criminal cases registered against the petitioners arising from the same set of facts and allegations.

4. On the other hand, the petitioner in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 189 of 2022 seeks transfer of FIR No. 18 of 2022 registered at Vidhana Soudha Police Station, Bangalore City, Karnataka to Adiramapattinam Police Station, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu where another FIR bearing No. 189 of 2022 was registered in respect of the speech given by the petitioner on 17th March, 2022.

6. The petitioners herein being members of Tamil Nadu Thowheed Jamath made a public address in a protest/meeting held within the jurisdiction of the Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai Cit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top